Many of us would argue someone share his smartness be the CEO for a couple of years may be good. The product road map has been layed out, someone who doesn't push people to the limit might have more people willing to work there for longer.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
When we become scared to speak truth to those in power, the US has truly lost its way.
Causalien
Prime 8 ball Oracle
You guys needs to get an Engineer in office. Most of them hate politicians and you get a higher chance of someone who will clean house.
Maybe you can, that is if you can show a loss. I picked up a couple hundred shares during after hours last night, so all I can do is show profit
Perhaps Musk will get a slap on the wrist (he can afford it) and get told to pre-approve anything containing numbers. They've got *nothing* on Tesla as a company, and any judge would throw out an attempt to fine Tesla.
James Anderson of Bailie Gifford has offered Tesla additional funding if they should need any (they don't). I don't think he has enough to take Tesla private by himself, but add in Larry Ellison and the Google founders and a few others and they might.
Musk was misled by the Saudis last time, who were bragging about how much money they had but didn't actually have as much money as they said they did. That won't happen again.
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
Swampgator
Active Member
Former SEC chair on CNBC is chilling. These guys want to "repress" Elon and his ability to speak freely. He says Elon does not behave like a "normal" CEO. These guys are truly 1984
And as others have pointed out already, the SEC has hurt shareholders more than the tweet from Elon, which did not move the share price materially.
And as others have pointed out already, the SEC has hurt shareholders more than the tweet from Elon, which did not move the share price materially.
hacer
Active Member
Yes of course. Lawyers do that all the time in court filings. Judges are all the time writing opinions mocking there willful misinterpretations of law and facts. It is how the game is played.
The fact that Elon has continued flouting the SEC last night and this morning is making me even more convinced that you could be right that he is planning to revive his privatization proposal. We discussed this possibility quite a bit here last night. New Tesla director Larry Ellison is worth more than Tesla and could be instrumental. Six months ago Elon had a list of financial institutions willing to participate in a private Tesla, and that list may have grown. The Saudis may be out, but some Chinese investors might have interest. Some institutions like ARK Invest may have to change their policy of only owning public companies, if they want to have a piece of a private Tesla. This could get interesting.
3m3 minutes ago
$TSLA short interest is $7.50 bn; 25.10 mm shares shorted; 19.83% of float; stock borrow is G.C.. #Tesla shares shorted declined by only 5k over the last week, but still up 318k in Feb. Shorts are up $116 mm in mark-to-market profits on today's 1.5% price move; up $1.01bn YTD.
0 replies1 retweet2 likes
Twitter. It's what's happening.
If Elon is removed from CEO role, how much will that cut TSLA valuation? 20%, 50%, more?!
Menifeer
Member
In NIO's prospectus, they claim that their batteries are more efficient than Tesla's.
They also claim 3 OTHER Chinese car companies have more efficient cells than Tesla.
My guess is most people here will not agree, but I'd love to hear an honest discussion about this.
For years, Tesla has claimed the most efficient batteries, this seems to contradict that claim in a big way.
They also claim 3 OTHER Chinese car companies have more efficient cells than Tesla.
My guess is most people here will not agree, but I'd love to hear an honest discussion about this.
For years, Tesla has claimed the most efficient batteries, this seems to contradict that claim in a big way.
I hope this story gets plenty of press. Elon is the good guy fighting climate change, taking us to Mars, and posting memes. SEC/Wall Street/oil lobbyists are the bad guys. The public will side with Elon.
I don't know any high-powered, creative lawyers, but there's definitely selective enforcement going on here; nobody likes that.
Any lawyers here? We could file an amicus brief as stockholders stating that the '500k' tweet was not material information and noting that the SEC's actions have been harming stockholders by distorting the public perception of the company. I think the judge would take notice.
Any lawyers here? We could file an amicus brief as stockholders stating that the '500k' tweet was not material information and noting that the SEC's actions have been harming stockholders by distorting the public perception of the company. I think the judge would take notice.
With 22% of control, you can give him a janitor title and not much will change.
Elon is very much grateful to all the trust Retail investors gave him over the years. Many of those own a Tesla too.
A go private would mean for most of those they cannot stay invested which is in particular true for international ones.
Its unlikely that Elon is leaving those investor in a buy out situation where they cannot participate in a private Tesla any more. He confirmed after the last attempt that this has been a major issue for him and reason to abandon the plan as there was simply no solution. Lets not forget that he could have done it before as he is not short of funding interest.
Its hard to imagine that after all he turns around and is doing exactly what he called a major issue for retail investors before.
Swampgator
Active Member
No they are claiming their vehicle is more efficient than a Model X.
A model 3 is as well.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
