You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Same here. Now I need my wife to change my TDAmeritrade password so I don’t do anything stupid
Good chance July 23 and 24 are held back by MM, and then we finally rip on the next Monday. But a $1,600 covered call might not even hold past this upcoming Monday or Tuesday...
IMO, Tesla should split the stock (preferably 20 for 1), and it should be announced along with the ER on July 22. Assuming all conditions are met for S&P inclusion, post-split share count of about 3.7B would greatly increase the liquidity of the shares. We don't want lack of liquidity to be a reason the committee declines to include.Between 97% larger mkt cap and the buying implications for Inclusion In the S&P index , coupled
With the largest short interest , creates some serious buying pressure dynamics.
this dynamic still continues to overcome profit taking .
Once the short interest diminishes and the stock is included in the index,
Then valuation expectations might play a bigger role.
Bull attack
IMO, your thinking is on the right track.BTW from an investor standpoint, we should not be looking at FSD as only some binary event. The continual improvement of FSD features will allow take rate / FSD price to both increase, even if it is not good enough for robotaxis.
I am not a financial modeler, but I can try some WAGs. Say Tesla has point to point FSD (Level 2) by the end of the year. Will require human intervention at times just like Autopilot on highways. At that time, what percent of purchases will pay for FSD at what price?
I would guess Tesla could sell it for $10,000 with a 50% take rate. Maybe that's conservative? As Tesla nears 1 million cars / year production rate early next year, that's around 1 billion in additional profit per quarter (just from FSD).
In another or so, again there are no robotaxis but the FSD has gotten so good that many people are Youtubing their autonomous commutes, and some jurisdictions even allow autonomous driving as long as there is a driver. At this point, the demand for the software is much bigger, Tesla could probably sell it for $20k at 50% take rate. Vehicle production rate is probably 1.5 million, so now it's ~ $3 billion additional profit per quarter.
Any better educated guesses on how much Tesla can earn from Not-Yet-Robotaxi FSD?
Could be the explanation for the spike: https://twitter.com/AsherWildman13/status/1281623831589814272?s=20
Surprise press conference from Florida Governor about Tesla upcoming.
Wha’appening??
Could be the explanation for the spike: https://twitter.com/AsherWildman13/status/1281623831589814272?s=20
Surprise press conference from Florida Governor about Tesla upcoming.
Could be the explanation for the spike: https://twitter.com/AsherWildman13/status/1281623831589814272?s=20
Surprise press conference from Florida Governor about Tesla upcoming.
Gary is going to grab and run very hard with this. He seems to be asleep right now. Just waiting for him to let the machine gun rip.Barron's - 18 minutes ago: Would Tesla Stock Rise 60% If Added to the S&P 500? Please, That’s a Stretch.
Excerpt:
Reuters, in a Friday article discussing Tesla's index inclusion, pointed to what happened to Yahoo's stock after it was included in the S&P 500 back in 1999, saying that shares of Yahoo! jumped "64% in five sessions between the announcement ...and its actual entry." Reuters also wrote that analysts predict high demand for shares upon Tesla's entry.
Some, however, are skeptical what happened to Yahoo! will happen to Tesla. Barron's suggested -- after talking with Baird managing director and trader Greg Gaynor -- that any gains from S&P inclusion are already reflected in Tesla's share price. Gaynor agreed, basing his opinions, in part, on what his clients are doing, many of which are actively trading shares. Tesla stock, after all, is up 50% over the past month.
Still, not every analyst thinks Barron's is right. Gary Black, a former tobacco-sector analyst for Bernstein in the 1990s and the former chief executive of Aegon Asset Management, told Barron's this past week he believes S&P inclusion isn't fully baked into the share price. He said inclusion could push the stock up more than 10%.
I learned that lesson far too late. I get physically ill when I think that I have lost 700 shares due to covered calls that I bought in at an average price of $360.