Agree with what you said. But the idea that the original 420 case was weak and now that Elon and his team would have another chance at the settlement they wouldn’t budge as much as played out as completely false. The new Twitter policy is just as if not a little more restrictive than the old one. And the tweet the SEC went to court over is basically exactly the type that now needs to be approved. Not hard to realize here that Elon’s side was not willing to throw away the settlement because even if the contempt motion was denied the settlement it self was in peril and they were not willing to go through the fraud case again.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
Agree with what you said. But the idea that the original 420 case was weak and now that Elon and his team would have another chance at the settlement they wouldn’t budge as much as played out as completely false. The new Twitter policy is just as if not a little more restrictive than the old one. And the tweet the SEC went to court over is basically exactly the type that now needs to be approved. Not hard to realize here that Elon’s side was not willing to throw away the settlement because even if the contempt motion was denied the settlement it self was in peril and they were not willing to go through the fraud case again.
Gotta applaud Musk tho, he checked his ego and did what’s best for the company and investors.
Thank you Elon.
Thank you Elon.
Pras
Member
I don’t short as I don’t understand shorting much. But I do think Lyft is an assailable business model and so is Uber.
The only people who won are lawyers that get paid for the nonsense.
Joe F
Disruption is hard.
Sure I'm still happy about it. Even happier that it was DCA'd down today.
How you making out?
I love a sale, and I'm in no rush to sell in the next few years. I have a long time horizon. Hope you do, too.
Tesla is not going to fail IMHO, so, I sleep well.
Always have dry powder is something I learned in '08 - '09.
[QUOTE="The infamous "make 500,0000 cars in 2019" number Elonism looks to be much harder to realize as it can't lean on botched delivery scheduling in the period preceding it. Nearly 10,000 over a week is what this would mean after 24 bit decoding. And we've not seen them get much past 2k for S+X, right? Might the partial Q1 shut down have also have helped maximum throughput? I want to believe it, but don't expect it.[/QUOTE]
Pretty much at this point, the 500k in 2019(or technically 500k run rate) is all based on if you think Giga 3 is going to be operational to the tune of 2-3k/week by the end of 2019. The latest news is encouraging on that front.....
Pretty much at this point, the 500k in 2019(or technically 500k run rate) is all based on if you think Giga 3 is going to be operational to the tune of 2-3k/week by the end of 2019. The latest news is encouraging on that front.....
This... this can’t be a real thing... right?
The source of the wave is transitioning assembly to produce the unique aspects of the exports - at full speed. I don’t know how they smooth that out other than accumulating inventory then shipping it at a constant rate. They need a buffer in the system.
Causalien
Prime 8 ball Oracle
Whatever position of power TSLA had to pressure this case went out the window when the Q1 ER showed a 300% worst result than predicted. Any more schenanigans with this case would've caused the stock price to drop even more.
It's actually a good time to do this since we are past the phase where we need startup style hype and fund raising. Elon's credibility is shot as well so hyping on twitter will have no effect at all. In fact, it'd proba ly have an adverse effect as ppl will now think, "here he goes with that 420 tweet again"
yeah, but in few months we can get another tweet, ooopsy. never know, maybe he finally learns.
Which stunt are you referring to? The one the SEC pulled? Because I have not seen any other stunt.
Joe F
Disruption is hard.
Actually, that idea doesn’t suck at all. Saturday morning in my neighborhood is pretty loud.
Joe F
Disruption is hard.
I'm totally going to create 10 Tesla Prediction Twitter accounts that all estimate different timelines/ production numbers, etc... And Elon can like/retweet whichever are correct
Anstandswauwau
Member
Should have rather said "SEC situation" which originated with the unfortunate "Funding secured" tweet / stunt / whatever you want to call it.
Just wanted to say: your avatar makes me happy.
It felt so bad today. Today’s stock movement felt like someone attacked me, I felt pushed, I am bruised, and I am full of anger and revenge.
Just a terrible feeling. On top I imagine all the TSLAQs must be celebrating today for have brought down the hope we had in TSLA. Feels like the stupid Uber ( who has no great impact on humanity is valued twice as Tesla) or Ford who sell gas guzzling vehicles are winning and Tesla keep getting pushed.
I know Tesla will strike back but that is for future. Today felt like *sugar*!!
Today sucked, but if your time horizon is years out, does it really matter what the stock is doing today?
I think technical analysis has its uses, tenuous as they may be, but candlestick formations do not exist in a vacuum, and are worthless in the face of material information. Does the SEC resolution fit that bill? We'll see. I'm interested to see if it brings some buyers in off the sidelines, which might lead to some FOMO buying pressure, and if that's followed up by solid April delivery numbers, we could get some relief in the stock price. A lot of "ifs" there, but it's something to think about.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
