RoadsterPlease
Member
she's alive. green EOD. 300 by october
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m at the five year mark on my RAV4, just needed new rear brakes. Other than that, very minimal maintenance and repair costs.Probably brakes and rotors, brake fluid change, coolant flush, maybe new 12v.
I still stand by my Amazon comments: haven't been swayed by the thoughts presented here.
There wasn't anything technologically complex about what Amazon has achieved in the online retailer business. It has been relatively easy to understand but yes, costly and time consuming to achieve.
Tesla's technological achievements have been 5-10x more complex than Amazon's, IMO.
Tesla would be better off without the FUD. But the FUD does let Tesla grab market share without other carmakers reacting. In the long run all this FUD is just doing harm to us humans, the auto industry and the shorters. Not to mention the media that is actively killing itself by becoming too untrustworthy to ever be taken seriously again.I keep thinking the following:
1. The more Wall St and the media has this misguided impression that Tesla is failing,
2. The more established automakers believe Tesla is not worth chasing because they'll die,
3. The more they refuse to budge from their existing ICE model,
4. The further ahead Tesla gets from the competition.
5. The higher TSLA goes longer term.
Bad for the future of our world, but ultimately good for my pocketbook. I will then spend those TSLA profits on more Teslas, which is then good for the world. Therefore, it's a win-win. Unless you're an established automaker, in which case you're doomed.
Feels like an effort to push SP above $230 by MM to avoid paying for 230 puts ? But a little early - they have to maintain this for next 90 minutes.Oh. Has the market realised this drop was nonsense?
That was me...but I was a little short on cash so it did not go through.I see a spike for 7.3 mil shares just bought. Wtf?
Request for financial analysis (@neroden ? @ReflexFunds ? @Fact Checking @KarenRei ?):
Business Insider highlights of Tesla Bull Gordon Johnson is the usual tripe, but includes one quantifiable complaint, that Tesla is not spending enough on capex. (I won’t include a link, easy to find by title “Tesla’s biggest bear on Wall Street ... blabla”):
“"Tesla's cap-ex in the quarter was a joke," he said of the $249.7 million reported line item. "For the past three quarters running, Tesla's cap-ex has been under its depreciation and amortization, meaning it's not investing enough to upkeep its equipment. That's not what growth companies do."
Wild guess: Is this perhaps because big capex expenditures were 4+ quarters ago, in cash, and the biggest one since is Shanghai which is financed by Chinese loans so doesn’t show up here? Maybe measuring capex on quarterly basis is not terribly meaningful? Or, is it possible that he has a point?
Saudis: Mr. JP Morgan, do you now have the 7.3m shares that we needed?I've seen some odd buy/sell spikes on Yahoo's chart before, but this one is the best to date
View attachment 434464
World domination will be very good for Tesla shareholders
Hey @elonmusk please please make the service department @tesla change their hold music. I’ll personally curate a new playlist if need be. This has been the most excruciating 40 minutes of hold music I’ve ever heard. Painful.
Good point. Getting fixed …
They are hedging higher than Q2 at this point.I wasn't able to follow the earnings that closely on Wed or the conf call but did Tesla give any guidance for production/deliveries for Q3?