Looks like they just randomly threw in those maintenance costs of $4,000 and $8,000.
My BMW going on 6 years, and my in-law’s BMW at 5 years, haven’t even cost close to $4,000 in maintenance costs. Of course our Tesla’s have cost even less. But, nothing like the discrepancy they’re trying to show.
But, my parent’s 7-year old Odyssey has had less maintenance costs than our Tesla’s though because the Tesla maintenance service, just like with every other luxury automaker, is an arm and a leg compared to likes of Toyota/Honda.
Edit: that comparison is a little funnier now. How in the world is insurance $6k for the Camry but less than that for the Tesla?? If that ain’t some FUD, I dunno.
So, without those unsubstantiated outrageous expenses attributed to the Camry, they basically showed that a Camry’s up-front and overall cost are lower than the cheapest 3.