You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a great chart. Thanks for sharing that!Tesla #3 by market cap now:
Top 25 Automakers by Market Cap
Do we know if Elon (or at least his plane) is still in Berlin?
That's not what the article says. The author is speculating, here is the exact quote:
"According to information obtained by the Global Times, the estimated weekly output will be 2,900 units at the phase-1 factory complex. So with six weeks left in the year, the factory could make 17,400 of the Model 3. "
I don't think anyone should expect that number. I would be very happy if Tesla reaches 1k per week at the end of December and produces somewhere between 1k and 5k Model 3s in China in 2019.
Thanks, that's helpful.I read it and I remember reading that part and thinking it was nothing bad. She's misrepresenting what he said. It was something along the lines of if he had know Model 3 was going to be a disaster he might have delayed the purchase of Solar City, since it delayed when they could actually focus on Solar City. He never said he regretted acquiring Solar City.
His overall argument is that the only reason Solar City struggled initially is because they needed to take away all the engineers and other resources to help with Model 3, but now they're back on track.
I took a large chunk of my IRA account and tried to time a takeoff in SolarCity(SCTY) from 2015 to 2016 with way out of the money LEAPs plus some shares. My plan was to be hyperagressive shooting for a 12-25x return if SCTY reached $80-100 within the year as a best case, 2x if it hit $70ish and still be alive in a worst case scenario.You do know how millionaires are made playing options, right? They start out as billionaires.
Personally, I think it is a mistake to evaluate Tesla as an automaker. It's like evaluating Apple as a handset manufacturer or a PC company. Tesla is in a class by itself and should be evaluated based on the sum of all their technology, not just cars. Analysts don't seem to get this.
Just put me on ignore then
Personally, I think it is a mistake to evaluate Tesla as an automaker. It's like evaluating Apple as a handset manufacturer or a PC company. Tesla is in a class by itself and should be evaluated based on the sum of all their technology, not just cars. Analysts don't seem to get this.
Yeah, watch out Tesla GM is coming. They are a tech innovator too!Personally, I think it is a mistake to evaluate Tesla as an automaker. It's like evaluating Apple as a handset manufacturer or a PC company. Tesla is in a class by itself and should be evaluated based on the sum of all their technology, not just cars. Analysts don't seem to get this.
Thanks, that's helpful.
If you mean Opel, that was a German company acquired by GM in 1929.They welcome tesla like they welcomed opal and ford in 1946. Any port in a storm. Once the sky cleared...they were not such nice partners.
Yep, 117% worth of speculation yesterday.That was NOT speculation. That was straight up tracking his plane, a fortuitous sighting of Elon AND Jerome in Berlin, known information about the awards show and past logical location calculations of where in Europe a Gigafactory could be placed; Poland, Germany, Spain, etc...
If you couldn’t put those pieces all together yesterday and come to a high probability of GF4’s location (at least six 9’s), then you just simply aren’t that informed about Tesla/Elon or the lights are on and nobody’s home.
Looks like another battle for 360...safe to say 350 has been conquered?
I had no idea GM owned Opel for that long.If you mean Opel, that was a German company acquired by GM in 1929.
Amen. I'm on record passionately defending "mainstream media" before, but the problem is I'm not sure what that means anymore. I still subscribe to publications like the FT, for instance, but Bloomberg, as demonstrated by such journalists like Dana Hull, or CNBC, etc. are more than useless, they are pernicious. Mark Spiegel is true to himself. What or who the heck is Dana Hull true to? (And Dana is one of the better ones; go figure.)As far as I’m aware, employees at for profit programming companies have taken no more of a journalistic oath than the person taking orders at the McDonalds drive thru has taken a nutritionist’s oath.
While I do think there is such a thing as journalism, I think the notion that giant for profit companies simply referring to themselves as “news” implies anything about the presence of journalism in their programming has decayed to the point of largely being a myth. The old USSR had the word “Republic” in its name, and the current Chinese government still does. North Korea one ups them both with “People’s Democratic Republic...”
This is so bizarre, the people who do this. Never seen even the remotest hint of what the truck looks like and what features it will offer for what price, but all ready to judge its appearance, market appeal, difficulty to manufacture, etc just from a few vague tweets. What sort of person does this?
And can't you just wait literally less than one week?