Now that his regular account is down the toiletHe's using his ALT account - which doesn't have the $TSLAQ blocklist applied: https://twitter.com/StanphylCap
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now that his regular account is down the toiletHe's using his ALT account - which doesn't have the $TSLAQ blocklist applied: https://twitter.com/StanphylCap
Now that his regular account is down the toilet
Thinking cap on.I am so baffled by non-movement in PM. Such low volume on a massive bank upgrading to BuY?
Maybe the wealthier client base of GS is not willing to spike up the PreMarket and would only buy when there are willing weak longs to part with the shares. But then, why wouldn't the other sharks bid it up already?
Scratching my head.
Tl;dr; great for Tesla, great for other pure EV OEMs. Closes indirect service loophole for ICE brands.
Michiganger here, O Canada, that is a misinformed article...
The settlement had zero interaction with the legislature. The lawsuit was Tesla v Secretary of State (plus governor and attorney general) (from previous administration). The settlement was an interpretation by the executive branch and approved by the judicial of the current law. Said interpretation allowed Tesla to operate subsidiary repair facilities and to perform every part of sales (delivery, trade in, help with paperwork, test drives) other than the actual title transfer/ sale (must happen out of state).
To correct:
Bills at Michigan Legislature - House Bill 6233 (2020)
And covered on this thread when it happened.
Round 2 was the legislature closing this loophole for everyone but Tesla (as a member of that lawsuit).
Round 2.5 was backing off on that loophole elimination.
Now it looks like pure electric manufacturers can be licensed and own repair facilities.
From the proposed bill (pdf didn't like copy paste)
View attachment 614094
View attachment 614095
View attachment 614096
Also:
There were zero changes to legislation.
Entire case is here:
Docket for Tesla, Inc. v. Benson, 1:16-cv-01158 - CourtListener.com
Settlement: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.miwd.85607/gov.uscourts.miwd.85607.267.0.pdf
Why? Did he accidentally flush it while working in his office? Even aside from his Tesla hate, he is a terrible human being. His tweets are always full of so much hate, misogyny etc.Now that his regular account is down the toilet
Of course Elon's options have not been turned into shares yet (imagine the headlines when he sells part to cover taxes/ basis) and he has 8 or so more years on the latest plan to do so.Indeed, but Elon's CEO comp. shares don't have to be issued immediately (see below), and Tesla could always do a 4:3 split, or a 3:2 split, etc. Here's recent share inventory, Per #223205:
July 20, 2020 shares: 186,361,726 * 5 = 931,808,630 (split adjusted)
Oct 20, 2020 shares: 947,900,733
Diff Oct-Jul = 16,092,103 shares
Sep 09, 2020 Equity raise = 11,142,000 shares (issued for $5B Cap raise)
Remaining shares unaccounted for = 4,950,103 shares (approx.)
Elon earned 2 tranches in Q2 2020, so we'd expect a little less than a 2% increase in the number of common shares after Elon's shares are issued (the exact number of shares to be issued was fixed in the 2018 CEO comp plan, but let's approximate his shares owing for now).
So, the remaining unaccounted for shares (4.95M) represent only about 0.52% of total shares outstanding. While this could easily represent stock-based compensation for other employees, officers and directors (who are known to be selling), but it's clearly not enough to cover Elon's CEO stock-based compensation (by a factor of 8).
The straighforward conclusion is that Tesla hasn't issued Elon's stock yet. IMO, Tesla may not issue the stock until it's unemcumbered (available for the Market), 5 yrs after those options vest. Remember, one of the terms of the CEO comp. plan is that Elon remain CEO, or Chief Product Architech, throughout the withholding period. It's not until then that the stock could be released by Tesla.
Let's watch what the share count is on the Jan 2021 SEC filing. We could also back-check the 2020-Q1 share count, since we know that Elon earned 1 tranche in June 2020.
Cheers!
So, was that GS note a starters pistol?
Lol, wait, the addtion date is Dec 21st, but you think the Index funds will be all done BEFORE then?!Not an expert, but it seems like Institutions are not buying this week as individual actors update and finalize their accumulation strategies in line with Dec. 18th triple witching liquidity. So buying starts to ramp up later next week and largely finishes on the 18th, with the slope of the ramp hard to predict?
Per my morning pre coffee read through:
If passed: Tesla (as a licensed all electric OEM) would finally be able to sell cars in Michigan (thus stopping the sales tax diversion occuring currently) and Tesla could directly own service facilities.
So super double plus good!
ICE OEMs would not be able to indirectly own service facilites (not that they do now, but the settlement pointed out that loophole)
Someone with Bloomberg access is encouraged to share the details of their article entitled Jim Chanos Say He’d Tell Elon Musk ‘Job Well Done’
Not worth the read....more or less he says the same old " profit due to regulatory credits...overvalued...blah blah"Tesla Bear Jim Chanos Says He’d Tell Elon Musk ‘Job Well Done’
Thanks for the head's up on the article!
Pro tip: Google the title, they're always other sources republishing it.
Tesla Bear Jim Chanos Says He’d Tell Elon Musk ‘Job Well Done’
Thanks for the head's up on the article!
Pro tip: Google the title, they're always other sources republishing it.
Not worth the read....more or less he says the same old " profit due to regulatory credits...overvalued...blah blah"