I've also joined the 999 limit order clubI'm there with you, "Your limit order to Buy 1 TSLA at 999.00 was received."
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've also joined the 999 limit order clubI'm there with you, "Your limit order to Buy 1 TSLA at 999.00 was received."
Removing differentials on vehicles used in off road situations is a great move- one less critical error point and this is just from the user POV, from a manufacturing POV I'd expect that to be equally helpful and from an economic POV it would provide at least some savings. I hope they are cognizant of the need to harden the armor around the motor housings. Speaking from experience of one who has smashed his differential in a field by hitting a well placed impossible to see rock. Broke both cap bearing bolts on passenger axle. Amazing that the truck would still drive and, sadly, I was able to/had to repair with new bolts while looking for a good salvage replacement (sadly because I had to do it..poverty is a cruel mistress but I love my work). Because there are so many f350/250's in the world finding one is really not an issue and I can be picky.It Is a bit unclear to me if rear wheel drive only is no longer a CT option?
A standard dual motor rear unit with steering ability makes sense as a standard on all CT. This mitigates the added complexity of steering by the removal of the differential. This would be the 2 motor version In this thinking.
Once the rear is decided as a standard, the question is the forward drive unit. One motor front drive unit might be a good option since it is already in production.
Going to a dual motor front drive unit is new engineering. Adding drive by wire would also be new. If drive by wire is already a settled decision then engineering a new dual motor unit drive unit at the same time makes some sense also for possible reasons I won’t go into.
Engineering a dual motor steerable drive unit would have multiple applications beyond todays product line and would possibly extend drive by wire to more products and increase standardization.
I believe Elon has CT in his thinking because soon must be pencils down as to design. The fact that the drive unit configuration is still in discussion reflects that pencils have been busy until recently IMO.
Extended design window is fine in this instance because the construction of the factory is still fluid as to the CT. A gift.
Drive by wire would be big and would influence many design decisions. It might be particularly difficult given present supply chain constraints.
It would be great to have a documentary focused on the CT development process from the metal up.
If the stock price goes up on Monday, I'm giving Audi credit for it."Somewhere, Over the Rooftop,
Way up high....."
Why, that's almost poetic.
In what way? Single motor has two shafts coming out of a differential, dual would have two shafts coming out of separate gear boxes, just like the rear of current Plaid. Engineering differences would seem relatively minor to me. Also Rimac already does this.Going to a dual motor front drive unit is new engineering.
Well adding steering. Interesting they will be adding steering to the rear.In what way? Single motor has two shafts coming out of a differential, dual would have two shafts coming out of separate gear boxes, just like the rear of current Plaid. Engineering differences would seem relatively minor to me. Also Rimac already does this.
This would be interesting and gets to other possibilities.Well adding steering. Interesting they will be adding steering to the rear.
If they really go for steer by wire the front and rear assembly on the quad motor in theory could be the same. This in itself would save a lot of cost.
Please do not stop--no offense taken here. We have come to rely on your sage, on point contributions and I look forward to them.I am sorry for having offended people. I therefore will stop. I have no desire to generate polemic reactions.
I haven't seen any signs that Tesla has any concern about competing with the F-150 Lightning or the Rivian. To me it looks like Tesla is just streamlining production. When they started costing everything out, they just said, "It makes a lot more sense to configure them like this." It might be related to the other change, the move from front-only steering to all-wheel steering.
Assuming the rumors are true, of course.
Wow! Must be about 40 carriers there, almost all of them fully loaded.
Yes, power to move any obstacle out of the way! In any direction. Including old fortifications etc ...Imagine a city car with four of such motors. Suddenly you have a car that can park (and drive) just about everywhere in Europe.
between the 8th and the 10th of December.by when can we expect the Total China sales number for Nov(local and export)?
Soon probably. Any given date might be construed as numerology though ...by when can we expect the Total China sales number for Nov(local and export)?
God bless this maniac for making me feel like my own bets are quite conservative.
I had an americano with some chocolate chip dippers from Trader Joe’s. I had 6 of them (maybe 8 but who’s counting?). Roughly 400 cals.Thanks for letting us know. Would you kindly tell us when you'd have breakfast tomorrow? And better yet, how many calories in it?