Still, several companies have lost suits over warranties conditioned only on use of OEM parts, even Weber grills lost on that. To my mind is is irrational to force any manufacturer of anything to be liable for ill effects of any OEM parts, or even use of non-OEM maintenance. Obviously independent suppliers of anything or services of anything would prefer to do their thing and have the OEM liable.Another argument for what Tesla ‘must do’ to be like other OEMs. Have we not learned yet that Tesla doesn’t have to copy or be like other OEMs to succeed? That being ‘different’ than other OEMs is actually what got Tesla to this point both from a company health and consumer satisfaction standpoint, and what will see Tesla being the last one standing.
It’s erroneous thinking, it’s stagnant thinking, to keep thinking things must be as they are in the now in the future for things to work out. Has Tesla not proven otherwise? That you don’t have to sell cars via a dealership model, that you don’t have to bring a car in every single time to service it, that a recall ain’t necessarily a recall, that fueling should mostly happen at home, that every vehicle can be 5*+++ for safety, that car manufacturing can be radically different than it has been for many decades, that maybe a steering wheel won’t be needed at some point -
Tesla doesn’t have to do anything like Honda (or Ford, or GM, or -) and I’m out the very second Tesla tries to emulate them in any way.
These things have become quite bizarre. Out of warranty is another matter, when OEM liability is much reduced, although nit totally eliminated.
There is a real risk that Tesla could lose one of these actions. Horrible to contemplate.