You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I seem to remember years ago reading that to decarbonize fast enough to head off catastrophic climate change, one nuclear reactor a day would need to be commissioned.200-300 nukes-worth* of power each year? Whhooof! Sooner or later (sooner, that is), that adds up to a dramatically large number, both in terms of realized production and realized diminution of fossil-fuel consumption.
* We used to think of a gig as being an average-sized nuke; I decreased that number because most new-ish plants are quite a bit larger.
I seem to remember years ago reading that to decarbonize fast enough to head off catastrophic climate change, one nuclear reactor a day would need to be commissioned.
well…
General question for those who track Tesla's progress against their statements from battery day. It's my "gut" that tells me that Tesla is somewhat behind their optimistic goals for the 4860 ramp. I think Tesla set incredibly aggressive develop, transition to production, and production time lines on the 4860 ramp. I think they decided that the physics was mostly solved with DBE and chemistries and it was just engineering the scaling (aggressive assumption). Believe it or not, I would stipulate that Elon felt if everything went well, they might even exceed the plans revealed on battery day. It feels like Tesla is probably behind those internal expectations- maybe even a little behind on the public expectations too, but not significantly. I offer the statement to not have a 2170 "backup plan" for 4860s in Berlin (or something like that) as my evidence. Am I misremembering anything here? Are we still on plan per public statements? I think the Tesla team is amazing and moving at light speed, so no knock against crazy aggressive goals...I just think I (and most in this thread) would benefit from a solid recap of Tesla's progress to put the 20M 4860 cell tweet in context.
That was my Say question but it is unfortunately already far down the list.Even though 20%/month growth is great, I think the 4680 delays highlight what a massive success Giga Nevada was getting to 35GWh/year for 3/Y. Doing the collaboration with Panasonic at the time was a very good strategy. Since then China has been growing like crazy while Japan has been stagnating so now it's collaboration with China and Korea that seems to be the name of the game.
My main question is when we can expect LFP production in NA and if Tesla intends to start making their own LFP.
I'm pleased with 4680 progress so far, things are more or less where I expected them to be.Even though 20%/month growth is great, I think the 4680 delays highlight what a massive success Giga Nevada was getting to 35GWh/year for 3/Y. Doing the collaboration with Panasonic at the time was a very good strategy. Since then China has been growing like crazy while Japan has been stagnating so now it's collaboration with China and Korea that seems to be the name of the game.
My main question is when we can expect LFP production in NA and if Tesla intends to start making their own LFP.
New page, six global partners (so far).
Home - Starlink - Direct to Cell
Just for clarity, my post is on a different thread. betstarship is using rhetorical questions referencing their quoting of the informationon on this thread.why is this a big deal? why post to this thread? worldwide internet connectivity everywhere with no dead zones in just a few years for all countries (even 3rd world).
Probably going to add a ton to GDP everywhere in a few short years.
e.g. Can internet access lead to improved economic outcomes?
Edit: TMUS, on the stock market, is certainly worth looking at.
Just for clarity, my post is on a different thread. betstarship is using rhetorical questions referencing their quoting of the informationon on this thread.
Ah, ye olde "acquihire", which AAPL also has been wont to do. Cf. google search "acquihire"So, basically the same thing they did with Maxwell, buy the company, transfer the patents and IP for dry electrode to Tesla, and then sell the company back to the original owners for a bargain. This time they probably got some wireless charging IP and a few really sharp engineers in the deal. Very smart, IMO. Tesla really doesn't need another company to manage, especially if most of their product isn't in the automotive or robotics fields.
...
Fremont is being rebuilt with the latest production equipment, and when fully ramped, I expect high production volumes.
...
I forgot to add.. let a thousand YouTube videos bloom, speculating about what “Tesla's Virtual Machine Mode” means and how it is a “moat” adding $10 trillion to the valuation
Virtual Machine Mode
As more wind and solar power replace fossil fuel generation, less mechanical inertia is available on the grid, removing a natural stability buffer in the case of a grid disturbance. Tesla’s Virtual Machine Mode is designed to address these stability challenges by virtually emulating mechanical inertia. Megapack’s built-in inverters with Virtual Machine Mode create grid-forming dynamics that provide grid strength, respond to added and rejected loads and maintain quality voltage at the point of interconnection. In South Australia, the Hornsdale Power Reserve alone can provide up to 3,000 megawatt-seconds of inertia by using Virtual Machine Mode — roughly half of the state’s entire inertia needs.