That's what I meant exactly. Yes, they were after the stops @ 200.Toni Scaramouch/Bernstein reiterated his $150PT before the Open (same as he's had since June). Wall-E don't need a good reason. They were hunting stops at 200.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's what I meant exactly. Yes, they were after the stops @ 200.Toni Scaramouch/Bernstein reiterated his $150PT before the Open (same as he's had since June). Wall-E don't need a good reason. They were hunting stops at 200.
It takes time for the new information we learned a couple weeks ago to fully filter into the share price.What new information today makes Tesla less profitable in the future?
And us mouth breathers.You sound a bit like Audubon here ... Friendly reminder to stick to simple language for me and others who did not grow up speaking English.
That's what I meant exactly. Yes, they were after the stops @ 200.
Close.Ford unlocks thousands of new charging stations with an unlikely partner
Owners of Ford's Mustang Mach-E and F-150 Lightning electric vehicles who have had a bit of trouble, are going to have a much easier time finding a place to charge their machines, thanks to a rival in their segment. Following a previous statement made in May, Ford announced in a statement on...finance.yahoo.com
So Elon’s really secret master plan is:
- osborne the competition’s EVs by enticing them to support NACS
- while at the same time driving prices down so that the competition looses even more money per EV they make
- so stalling the progress of the competition for a couple of years
- so that Tesla can 2x their economies of scale by the time the competition has NACS capable cars.
- so that the competition has to fire their UAW personnel.
How close am I?
No comments... either very old news or everyone believes the Cybertruck pricing? If so, how?A bit dated (22 hrs) but in case you didn't see this on debunking Cybertruck Pricing yesterday. James here makes a great case IMO.
My question is whether there's any reason to allow this to propagate by Tesla without a single X tweet to correct it?
My conclusion is this could be intentionally allowing the market to be misguided for a moment. I don't know why, so it's just a floating theory for now. Maybe keep off some pressure while some UAW dust settles? IDK
Close.
This has been semiobvious the whole time.
Who will want to buy a non-NACS car next year? The resale value on any non Teslas for models before 2025 will drop more than 2025+ models. Adapters will not change that.
I'm not sure how many prospective buyers have figured this out yet so hard to know if the recent slowdown has other reasons but the closer we get to 2025 models the harder it will be to sell the 2024s.
No comments... either very old news or everyone believes the Cybertruck pricing? If so, how?
Could you imagine Ford Motor Credit? The auto dealers seem to hesitate in lowering prices. This is why... default loans would skyrocket as people would wait for further price reductions until inventory is gone.
why wouldn't an adapter change that? if it worked the same either way, i don't get why someone would care.
I would draw the conclusion that this is especially unfair, even if an automaker would be found to not have gotten subsidies in China, he would be subject to the same duty when importing to the EU . I guess this is probably a result of the fact that duties are usually applied to imports from a certain country, not for a certain manufacturer.
It is most likely new Macs with "Scary fast" chips. Or maybe the Apple Television set that everyone was absolutely certain of over a decade ago.it’s almost definitely nothing.
…but “scary fast” Apple event tonight going to show off a car and someone knows? Someone always knows something.
Adapters are a pain.why wouldn't an adapter change that? if it worked the same either way, i don't get why someone would care.