Reuters is likely just using Pacer, which is federal courts.
The internet hype-stars are a different problem, as are the sometimes bizarre pronouncements of the various “market experts” and the more bloviating of the fund managers. Then, there are the shorts. Who should be the subject of some of these courtroom stories. All these groups aren’t working together, they’re all up to different things for different reasons.
Sure. they’re just typing it. they could have turned that around in five minutes. believe what you need to. The actual FUD from MSM is not conspiracy stuff, it’s just the same amount of ignorance and incompetence to be found in any profession.Ummmm.....They've been doing that on a daily basis. How would you explain all those articles when they do 0 research and claim 'reliable sources' or when their 'facts' are proven wrong, you do not see an apology or an 'updated' follow up?
The internet hype-stars are a different problem, as are the sometimes bizarre pronouncements of the various “market experts” and the more bloviating of the fund managers. Then, there are the shorts. Who should be the subject of some of these courtroom stories. All these groups aren’t working together, they’re all up to different things for different reasons.