TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Waterloo’s silicon battery technology promises a 40 to 60 per cent increase in energy

Discussion in 'Battery Discussion' started by Ktowntslafan, Oct 29, 2015.

  1. Ktowntslafan

    Ktowntslafan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
    #1 Ktowntslafan, Oct 29, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 29, 2015
  2. Ktowntslafan

    Ktowntslafan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
    I'm no chemical engineer...so would love to get some feedback from people in the know. This SOUNDS like a significant breakthrough that will likely benefit only GM in the auto sector. Agree/disagree?
     
  3. RDoc

    RDoc S85D

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,569
    Location:
    Boston North Shore
    Let's discuss this again after they produce the first 1000 kWh worth of actual, physical, batteries. Vapor batteries are always quite impressive.
     
  4. ggr

    ggr Roadster R80 537, SigS P85 29

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,473
    Yes, indeed! I just invented a new vapor battery, in which the anode, cathode and electrolyte are all vapor! The charge rate is great, the energy density in Wh/kg is great, the only problem is that while it is very light, it's actually very large. Actually the other problem is that it's hard to solder the contacts on to it.
     
  5. Ktowntslafan

    Ktowntslafan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
    Fair to say you are sceptical?

    - - - Updated - - -

    ditto?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Li-ion Batteries Keep Improving, But for What Application? - IEEE Spectrum
     
  6. trils0n

    trils0n 2013 P85

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,280
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    I don't see why it would only benefit GM. Tesla has started using silicon in their 90kWh battery. Silicon anodes are typically plagued by short lifespan. If their research actually materializes as a viable product, I assume it would help Tesla, or anyone else, using silicon in the anode.
     
  7. Ktowntslafan

    Ktowntslafan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
    July 17, 2015

    The energy density improvement is possible without the need to increase the physical size of the battery pack. That’s because the lithium-ion battery cells now uses silicon for part of its anode, Musk said. Lithium-ion battery cells typically use graphite for anode.Lots of research has looked into the benefit of using silicon for the anode because silicon can hold a lot more lithium ions. But it also can expand so much that it fractures and becomes unstable. Tesla uses Panasonic’s lithium-ion cells.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/uciliawang/2015/07/17/why-tesla-rolls-out-better-ev-batteries/

    - - - Updated - - -

    The article references a partnership of sorts between GM and the research being performed at Waterloo...so I'm assuming GM has first dibs. Does anyone have more info?
     
  8. Jeff N

    Jeff N Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,117
    Enquiring minds want to know if this silicon anode technology is part of the LG Chem cells that will starting being made next year for the Chevy Bolt and other "200-mile" cars. That could explain how they are managing to tuck ~60 kWh into a smaller car without using the Tesla/Panasonic NCA chemistry. I think that article about the Waterloo work also suggests that it could see commercial use as soon as next year.... Any licensing preferences that GM may or may not have from assisting on this work could also be part of the explanation for why GM is only paying $145 per kWh when other LG customers are apparently paying more.

    Or not.
     
  9. eye.surgeon

    eye.surgeon Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    706
    Location:
    California
    It must be time for the daily revolutionary breakthrough in batteries-- that will never make it past the lab.

    Consider that the battery has been around about the same time as the internal combustion engine. When was the last ICE revolution that doubled horsepower while halving fuel consumption?

    Progress will be steady and incremental. There's no miracles to be had here.
     
  10. Ktowntslafan

    Ktowntslafan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
    I like this theory.
     
  11. artsci

    artsci Sponsor

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    4,673
    Location:
    Timonium, Maryland
    I'm always suspicious of this kind of press release science. When they have a working battery in a working car I'll become a believer. For now it's all claims without much proof in the real world. But more power to them.
     
  12. Ktowntslafan

    Ktowntslafan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
    Also, It is patented...and it's not clear by who. So the announcement may help some companies...and not others.
     
  13. wdolson

    wdolson Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2015
    Messages:
    2,505
    Location:
    Clark Co, WA
    From what I've read because silicon expands massively when it absorbs lithium ions (actually it can't be the silicon atoms, it must be the crystalline structure), anodes with high levels of silicon have a short life expectancy. The Panasonic batteries with some silicon have about as much as they can handle before the anodes start getting fragile. It may be possible to come up with an anode the is flexible enough to expand and contract many thousands of times before failure. But like many in this thread have said, I want to see it working in the real world first. I also want to see it working for some period of time. A battery that can only be charged a few times before failure isn't very useful for a frequent charging application.
     
  14. Ktowntslafan

    Ktowntslafan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
    “The economical flash heat treatment creates uniquely structured silicon anode materials that deliver extended cycle life to more than 2000 cycles with increased energy capacity of the battery,” said Professor Chen.

    "More than 2000 cycles" is significantly better then "a few times". Charging daily, this would suggest a lifespan of 5.5 years at a minimum. Do I have that right?
     
  15. paulkva

    paulkva Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    565
    Location:
    Falls Church, VA
    Sounds like you need ... wireless charging. :rolleyes:
     
  16. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    3,399
    Location:
    San Diego
  17. brucet999

    brucet999 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,299
    Location:
    Huntington Beach, CA
    They claim more than 2,000 charge cycles. If a daily driver, charging, say, 5 days a week, 50 weeks per year, it should last about 8 years.
    Hmmmm, where have I heard that lifespan before?
     
  18. Ktowntslafan

    Ktowntslafan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario
  19. Canuck

    Canuck Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2013
    Messages:
    3,927
    Location:
    South Surrey, BC
    I'll quote Elon Musk on this, yet another, breakthrough battery claim:

    “My top advice really for anyone who says they’ve got some breakthrough battery technology is please send us a sample cell, okay. Don’t send us PowerPoint, okay, just send us one cell that works with all appropriate caveats, that would be great.”
     
  20. Cyberax

    Cyberax Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    270
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    If you want to be pedantic, batteries existed long before the internal combustion engine. They even predate railroads.

    However, lithium batteries first became available for large-scale commercial applications only in the late 90-s. It took them nearly 30 years to get there - the first Li-Ion cells were developed in early 70-s!

    Batter. Development. Is. Hard.

    However, we do know that the current battery technology is far from optimal - there are laboratory samples that easily have 3-4 more energy density, but that are not viable because of rapid degradation or chemical instability. Is it a stretch to believe that somebody managed to find a way to move technology from lab to actual production?
     

Share This Page