ℬête Noire
Active Member
You haven't factored in sales tax.
Unless CA is a special case(?), that isn't likely so. Sales tax will be calculated on purchase price. You don't get that $7500 back until next tax return, so it won't affect that.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You haven't factored in sales tax.
Unless CA is a special case(?), that isn't likely so. Sales tax will be calculated on purchase price. You don't get that $7500 back until next tax return, so it won't affect that.
Yes, that is my understanding....I'd love to hear if I'm wrong. EDIT: Wait, what's the question again??? LOL, maybe we're getting lost in levels of negatives here, so some numbers.It seems like you are disagreeing and then saying the same thing the post you are replying to said. Basically the LR costs even more, because you pay the extra sales tax and the availability of the tax credit doesn't affect the sales tax.
I have had several debates with friends and family over this topic. It all comes down to personal preference, life style and financial situation. Here is why I would disagree with your logic:This is a decision that is personal from my perspective. It is somewhat unique but may apply to a minority of a few others. Rather than give me a disagree, tell me why you disagree with my logic.
I have a driving lifestyle that makes a 310 mile range car, as opposed to a 220 mile range car, meaningless to me. I make trips longer than 300 miles maybe once a year. A 220 mile range is more than sufficient for me for daily driving. I am in the slow lane of life at this point and spending an additional 30 minutes at an extra supercharger stop on a 500 mile trip once a year is inconsequential to me.
I realize that waiting for the SR version might defer my delivery to late 2018 or even early 2019. That scenario will put my qualification for the full $7500 tax credit in serious jeopardy although $3750 tax credit would be likely.
Because of my position in line, I will probably be invited to configure in 30-60 days. So, I would need to spend $9000 on LR version to save a $7500 tax credit. I would be losing $1500! Yes, I understand that means I could get the LR, an option I would rarely if ever use, for only $1500. That does not make financial sense to me in my particular, specific, unique situation. By waiting for the SR version, I can save $9000 plus an additional $3750, that equates to $12,750. That sum will buy me a lot of options on the SR version - PUP, EAP, paint, wheels.
So yeah, I will wait for model 3SR.
Do you happen to sell timeshares for a living? If not you should totally look into doing that.I have had several debates with friends and family over this topic. It all comes down to personal preference, life style and financial situation. Here is why I would disagree with your logic:
1. You mentioned this is your dream car in a previous post, why wouldn't you want the premium package?
2. You also mentioned in the near future, either Tesla or an after market place can swap the battery when it goes bad, why not opt for the better, longer lasting battery with an extended warranty compared to the SR battery? Did you account for how much this may cost down the line?
3. Life is short, if the car is your dream, start living your dream!
I think that many, if not most, people stop at SuperChargers about every 120 to 150 miles on a road trip, so charging enough to reach the next one is only 120 miles, not 200.Although it may not be a big deal to you, keep in mind that the SR Model 3 will also charge more slowly at any given Supercharger stop. Adding 200 miles of range to a LR Model 3 will be much faster than adding the same 200 to a SR version. So it's extra stops on a long trip plus more time at each stop.
I think that many, if not most, people stop at SuperChargers about every 120 to 150 miles on a road trip, so charging enough to reach the next one is only 120 miles, not 200.
I find that I am ready for a bathroom break every couple of hours anyway, so I won't be driving 200 miles nonstop anyway. My S-70 has only 211 miles range on a 90% charge and that slightly shorter range may cost me 40 minutes more in a 500 mile trip.
For the road trips, drive faster. you use more energy going faster but you can replace the energy at a supercharger faster than you can burn it on the road, so the net effect is a shorter trip. Let's use some numbers here and say you get 330wh/mi at 65 and you get 450wh at 85. For a 120mile leg that's 39.6kwh in 1:50 and 54kwh in 1:24 you can more than make up that 14.4kwh difference in 26 minutes at a supercharger. In fact you would have to charge slower than 33kW to make that not work. since you'd have used up more energy you'll actually be charging at the higher 90-100kw+ range longer and you'll more than make up the difference.We take a lot of road trips. My current road trip car can make the run from San Francisco to north Orange County on one tank with about 80 freeway miles left over. If my kids are sleeping, I'm not stopping. I have no desire to turn a 6-7 hour road trip (one tank of gas) into a 9-10 hour one (stopping at Superchargers every 120 miles + driving slower as to not sap range as much).
For the road trips, drive faster. you use more energy going faster but you can replace the energy at a supercharger faster than you can burn it on the road, so the net effect is a shorter trip. Let's use some numbers here and say you get 330wh/mi at 65 and you get 450wh at 85. For a 120mile leg that's 39.6kwh in 1:50 and 54kwh in 1:24 you can more than make up that 14.4kwh difference in 26 minutes at a supercharger. In fact you would have to charge slower than 33kW to make that not work. since you'd have used up more energy you'll actually be charging at the higher 90-100kw+ range longer and you'll more than make up the difference.
This is true for any speed difference, the supercharger can charge you faster than you can burn the energy at any speed. Basically, go as fast as you can to finish each leg alive and without a ticket.
Thank you! I did not know that. That will be helpful on certain trips.
For long ones, I'm still taking ICE. No stops needed. If I'm going hundreds of miles, doing 400+ without a stop is nice. I just wanna get there.
For shorter ones, with kids, building in some delay time is not too big a deal. Having a break on a 2 hour ride seems more of a necessity to them than a 7+ hour trip. My main hangup was learning to drive at a slow speed. With your info, it looks like I won't have to. Excellent news for me. There are a LOT of Teslas around here, but they all cruise at 65 in the slow lane. I was getting worried.
I think that many, if not most, people stop at SuperChargers about every 120 to 150 miles on a road trip, so charging enough to reach the next one is only 120 miles, not 200.
You must be under 55 years old.Sure. They could. But it would be somewhat wasteful to stop every 120 miles in an EV with 310 miles of range. The LR version allows you to skip Superchargers.
Tesla is charging very little for supercharging. It's still way cheaper than gas. For me, it's actually cheaper to charge at a Supercharger than it is to charge at home.
You must be under 55 years old.