Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Charging Station standards

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
From vfx' linked article:

Electric car makers and power companies are to unveil this week a standard Europe-wide power plug to recharge the batteries of electric vehicles, the German newspaper Die Welt reported Sunday. The agreement avoids the plug-and-socket problems familiar to travellers who take small appliances such as hair-dryers abroad.
It will be announced at the five-day Hanover Fair, a big annual expo of industrial products which opens for business on Monday in Germany. Die Welt said the standard had been agreed by 20 big companies.

The connectors were designed for a 400-volt power supply with up to 63 amperes of current.

So is this a version of the J1772 standard, or something new?
 
GM lobbies for electric car plug standardization

Coulomb Technologies Showcasing SAE J1772 Networked Charging Stations for Plug-in Vehicles | EcoSilly
...
This new Yazaki coupler will, however, be able to deliver much more than the former Level II power limit (6.6 kW), perhaps as much as 16-19 kW. This medium power capability is necessary in order to obtain reasonable charge times with upcoming long-range BEVs. Tesla Motors will be shipping their Roadster in 2008 with a 52 kWhr battery. With the former Level II charge limits of 6.6 kW, charge times for a 52 kWhr battery would become unreasonably long, perhaps as much as 7-8 hours. This charge time duration would extend beyond preferred late-evening low-cost Utility rate schedules, while a medium-power 3-4 hour charge could be scheduled to “fit” better into these upcoming schedules.
It is assumed that high power capable EVs (50+ kW) would now make use of a separate on-vehicle higher-power inlet standard that is yet to be developed. Overall, the attractiveness of all PHEVs and BEVs making use of an consistent, almost worldwide J1772-Yazaki-based low-to-medium power connection standard more than outweighs the loss of potential high power capability with the former Avcon connector. The need for and attractiveness of higher “fast charge” power capability for EVs is not yet proven to be necessary to market BEVs...​





http://www.geocities.com/evcharging/images/level2plus.pdf


J1772
...The J1772 standard specifies a specific 5-pin plug (two power, two signal, one ground) for single-phase supply up to 80A....






 
400 V & 63A - will that fit the build of the Model S quick charger ? Does that mean it is DC ? Will the Roadsters be retrofitted or retrofitable ? Is TM on board with this decision ?

I don't think so. I think J1772 is single phase AC only.

400V@63A is 25.2kW
If the 'S' has a >70kWh pack then that is still about 3 hours to recharge, not 45 minutes.

I think Tesla QuickCharge will be a different connector, probably like 480V@125amp (45 minutes to recharge 42kW 160 mile pack, 1 hour for 60kWh 230 mile pack, and 70 minutes for the 70kWh 300 mile pack).
^^^just guessing though^^^
 
Yeah this wonder connector is still not capable of the "super fast" charging that Tesla is talking about. High voltage for sure, but not very high current. This is NOT J1772.

J1772 level two is single phase up to 80A. Quite a bit more umph than this will be capable of.
 
I'm curious what the signal protocol is for the SAE connector. Seems like something more for IEEE rather than SAE.

I am not sure what they are doing with "new improved J1772", but some details of the original (somewhat low tech) standard can be found here.
...The control box sends a 1 kHz 12 volt square wave through a 1000 ohm resistor
to the pilot pin. The duty cycle of the square wave is set to indicate how much current can be supplied
from the AC mains. In the AVCON box the duty cycle is fixed at 50% indicating that 30 Amps (RMS) is
available. Therefore the circuit must supply at least 30 Amps since some chargers measure the square
wave to determine how much current they can draw. An outlet which can only supply 20 amps will have
a square wave with a smaller duty cycle and one which can supply more a larger one. The return current
from the pilot pin is through a resistor and a diode in the EV to frame ground. If the frame ground
connection is ever broken the box will immediately open the contactor...
Apparently Better Place views this RWE/Daimler IEC 'standard' as competition, not standardization:
...The alliance of more than 20 leading European suppliers and auto companies are working together on laying the foundation for widespread introduction of electric cars...
...
As Better Place was not invited to join this alliance it seems to be a strong competition at least in Europe.
I still hope that the alliance will work together with Better Place and not against.
But my concern is that the big corporations involved want to takeover the business model of providing mobility.
And as these big corporations first want to secure their business the alliance might become another
oligopoly in this area (like the opec countries) and this is for sure not the best for the consumer...
 
Last edited:
http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/06/1B/T061B00000200101PPTE.ppt
http://www.ecs-five.ch/parkcharge/documents/MENNEKES+and+EV.pdf
e-mobility Berlin / MINI-E-Berlin...both projects will use the CEEplus system...
So, I think we have competing standards:

  • [FONT=&quot]IEC 62196-1 <== e-mobility. 400V 3-phase. Primarily Europe
    [/FONT]
  • [FONT=&quot]IEC 62196-2 [/FONT]
  • [FONT=&quot]SAE J1772 <== Single phase AC. Primarily USA and Japan
    [/FONT]
Basically SAE is USA, & IEC is Europe. They tend to say that they will coordinate, but then end up doing different things.

http://www.ecosilly.com/2008/12/02/...orked-charging-stations-for-plug-in-vehicles/
The {J1772} connector may also become the standard in Japan, where the SAE and the Japanese standard body are making good cooperation. Although a proposal has been made to incorporate the SAE connector interface in IEC standards although Italy and Germany are proposing alternative connectors. (Design for single-phase power is problematic for countries where 3-phase is also used, notes Cyriacus Bleijs, Chairman IEC TC69.)

Here was an attempt at a collaborative concept.
 
Last edited:
BYD (?)
byd1.jpg
 
VEVA - Report on Activities of Committees for Standards on Charging Infrastructure
After some name googling on who's who and is involved with the SAE J1772 standards committee for EV charging, I found that Yazaki is giving a report next week to the committe on design considerations. Yazaki make lots of automotive connectors. There is also current discussion on Level 3 fast charging plug designs. They have a very different connector than the old J1772 standard that was popular on the Ford Ranger EV. The ongoing debate within this committee will have impact on the final cordset for charging to be adopted by most OEM automakers. Deliberations apparently are expected to conclude by March 2010. The J1772 committee deliberations are closed discussion, but by looking at who the committee members are and the companies they are with and their backgrounds and interests and other papers published some implications are apparent. It appears that deliberations are far from complete. An attempt at international standardizations is going on. A new plug may be in the works. 220V / 32A is a driver from Europe. It seems all the right players are at the table.
- Don Chandler

Also the secretarty of the IEC T69 committee Peter Van Den Bossche had these papers of interest on his website:
Related current standards:
  • IEC TC69
  • ISO TC22 SC21 [45]
  • SAE J1772
  • National Electric Code
  • Canadian Electric Code Part 1 Section 86 and Part 2 for chargers.
  • UL
 
I am not sure what they are doing with "new improved J1772", but some details of the original (somewhat low tech) standard can be found here.
...The control box sends a 1 kHz 12 volt square wave through a 1000 ohm resistor to the pilot pin. The duty cycle of the square wave is set to indicate how much current can be supplied from the AC mains.
That square wave duty cycle is how the current Tesla HPC pilot signal works as well.

You'd think the new connector standard would be capable of some two-way communication for things like negotiating payment, V2G, and whatever else.
 
This sounds familiar:

SAE World Congress -- Autoblog Green
SAE 2009: SAE J1772 plug standard could be finalized by this fall...
...The connector is designed for single phase electrical systems with up to 240 V and 70 A such as those used in North American and Japan....
...This plug is unrelated to the recently announced European plug standard. That plug is designed for 400 V three phase applications.
Lots of good discussion here:
Do you have 220 Volts available at home? - ApteraForum.com
240v charging and the electrical code - Page 4 - ApteraForum.com - Aptera Car Forum

4062_3656_ZOM.jpg



Check all the comments here too:
Plug-in Standards Necessary for Consumer Acceptance of Electric Vehicles Like the Chevy Volt | GM FastLane

From what I can tell, the 2009 version of J1772 will have a two way much more intelligent signal interface, but it hasn't been published yet. Once they ratify it, it may show up for sale on a site like this:
http://www.sae.org/servlets/productDetail?PROD_TYP=STD&PROD_CD=J1772&HIER_CD=TEVHYB&WIP_SW=YES
http://www.sae.org/servlets/productDetail?PROD_TYP=STD&HIER_CD=TEVHYB&PROD_CD=J1773&WIP_SW=YES
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
I'm curious what the signal protocol is for the SAE connector.

While searching for such information I found various references to PDFs from SAE (and EPRI) workgroup sessions. They included links to documents which are no longer online. My guess is that various proposals are in the process of being approved, but those involved with the groups are trying to prevent the details from getting wide public distribution just yet. Besides, SAE tries to sell such publications once they are finalized.

Some example documents that were once online, but removed are these:
http:/ / et.epri.com/documents/E229630_04_Kissel_June_2008.pdf
http:/ / et.epri.com/documents/10.02.08_IWC_PHEV_presentations/PHEVWG_minutes_Atlanta.pdf
http:/ / et.epri.com/documents/12.11.08_IWC_PHEV_presentations/02_Kissel_December_2008.pdf

Also, many sites linked to this old article which has also been removed:
http:/ / greencarcongress.com/2008/12/coulomb-techn-1.html

Some details remain in google cache, but I won't post links to that.



Note, even the older J1772 documents talk of "Serial Data Transfer", but they were for high speed "Level 3" charging, and the actual production units only did Level 1 & Level 2 and didn't implement the advanced data transfer features.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/stakeholders/infrastructure/finalsaej1772.doc
... 5.5 Serial Data Transfer - Coupler contact numbers 7, 8, and 9 are provided to allow an exchange of serial data information between the EV and the EVSE based on SAE J1850, SAE J2178, and SAE J2293. The serial data link is mandatory for DC Charging to allow the vehicle to control the charge process. The serial data link is optional for AC Level 2 and AC Level 1 - i.e. for displaying charge related or other information to the user. ...
 
Last edited:
Electric Vehicle Standardisation
...

  • The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
  • The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO)
  • Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)
  • Japanese Electric Vehicle Association (JEVA)
I don't really find much mention of the IEEE related to any of this.

---

Some ETEC publications:
The Evolving Standardization Landscape for Electrically Propelled Vehicles
A View On Current Trends In Electric Vehicle Standardisation

---

Link bonanza:
Electric Vehicle ReCharging Information
 
Last edited: