Some of the comments here are hilarious. "it is good to cut S and X staff". Someday the company will fire everyone, and it will still be good because 'Elon can waive his magic wand to send cars OTA to the customers. A car that never requires any service and runs for a million miles. Who needs workers? It's all an AI simulation.'.
People, are we forgetting that we are talking about an exponential growth company here, the one that will take over all sectors, not just autos? If in doubt, ask Adam. The CEO's favorite buzzword is 'exponential'. It should be hiring lots of people, not firing lots of people.
If these are performance based firing, the hiring process and management must be terrible to have to fire so many from the factory at once right before the ramp to 500k cars in 2018
What is a worse performance than producing 260 pre-production M3s instead of 1630 production M3 in Q3?
What's worse than not delivering EAP in a year instead of 6 months?
So, it took Tesla 4 years to figure out Juan was an underperformer? Got it!
Is it the workers that slowed down M3 production, if the vendors are reporting no to slow demand for parts from Tesla and GF still hasn't ramped up enought to have an output worthy of a tweet? Check.
Tesla said the performance-based departures were not considered layoffs and not subject to state notifications.
What a brilliant excuse to hide the number of layoffs.
The clean energy company — maker of luxury electric vehicles, battery storage and solar roofs — has failed to post an annual profit even as its stock has soared on promises of revolutionary products. About 450,000 customers have placed $1,000 deposits for the Model 3.
I'm having serious doubt about the 450,000 number. The company is not showing any sign of gearing up to that level of production.