dirtyofries
Member
I'm a bit dubious that the sales person would either know that, or be willing to share it. Fun to think about though.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NASDAQ is way down.Yes I think it is a short attack. Overall market is up and Tesla is down. Way down. 310
I wasn't comparing semi to model 3 in terms profit by battery cell, though Tesla will make money from charging as well. Maybe as much as 30%. I was merely comparing consumption or amount of fossil fuels offset. You know, the mission of Tesla. Why do a semi now? A roadster and a semi. Why now? Timing seems odd unless you look at the fact that Tesla will become the largest utility on the planet charging semis and offset the most fossil fuels by far then any other single vehicle.
A related question is what people of “own-charging” systems sold by Tesla will include solar panels and Powerpacks?
I expect that we'll see plenty of businesses that build some of their own charging infrastructure that they either use exclusively (all trucks return at night to a central parking lot / charging area), or a mix of own charging plus on-the-road charging. I don't have any kind of guess at the proportion - only that own-charging (comparabe to today's garage charging) will be >0% and <100% (not exactly going out on a limb there .
Advancing fast on so many tracks, each requiring huge amounts of cells to scale (M3, MY, pickup truck, Semi, battery storage) they must believe they will be able to finance and build a large number of GFs quickly enough to keep up with rising volume of all the products that consume them. The number of GF needed to keep up, I think, is larger than what we've imagined up until now. Executing all of those, the right number and timing, is I think going to be a huge challenge. Far larger than anything they've managed to execute so far.
NASDAQ is way down.
Tesla and Panasonic codeveloped custom large scale production processes and equipment for use at the Gigafactory. I believe that most of the additional twenty percent reduction in costs that they said would happen by the end of building Gigafactory One is due to the fact that building subsequent copies of that equipment will cost less and be much faster to build.I know you were weren't comparing respective Tesla profits for Semi vs M3 etc. I was pointing out that Tesla will take a big hit profit wise if they build and sell large numbers of Semis before they have a large enough supply of cells to do both. Plus other products that need cells.
I share your hope Tesla will become a huge and profitable electric utility, driven by them providing a good portion of the recharging energy needed for trucking industry to move from diesel to EV. Everything seems to tie back to them being able to build enough battery GF capacity. It's too bad, at least for analyzing all these pieces, Tesla has kept most details about battery production progress at GF secret. It makes attempts to analyze how fast they will be able to ramp the battery production they must have akin to tea leaf reading.
Fun to think. I would guess if they have a lot of reservations, it could have caused some internal buzz, so rumors of reservations might spill out. On the realistic side, that is a huge and somewhat crazy number for a $250,000 car that is not available for 2+ years. If real, it could speed up some plans though.I'm a bit dubious that the sales person would either know that, or be willing to share it. Fun to think about though.
The M3 might still get a hud after the MS-MX.Somewhat OT, but back in the days when we all thought the Model 3 was going to have a HUD, this is basically what I thought Tesla were going to project onto the screen... especially when a nav route is plotted. (Based on some of the hires)
Alibaba-backed augmented reality start-up makes driving look like a video game
You left out that a big part of the market for charging equipment will be solar panels and Powerpacks.I think we are looking at two different things. I was estimating the market for new trucks, not the market for fuel.
According to the IEA, trucks used for road freight consume 17mb/d of fuel. This is 261B gallons of diesel per year. At $2.5/gal, this would be a fuel market worth $652B per year.
Now if this global fleet of trucks were magically all transformed into electric trucks, we would be looking at power consumption of about 2606 billion kWh. At 7c/kWh this would be worth $182B.
So at this grand scale, replacing the commercial fleet with electric trucks could replace a $652B market for diesel with a $182B market for commercial scale charging. I figure that the market for new trucks is around $135B to $170B. So even with electric trucks the market for power may still be slightly larger than for the trucks themselves. The combined market for trucks and charging could be about $250B. Even this combined market is less than half the cost of just the diesel presently consumed by trucks. This huge savings for the global economy is precisely the economic fuel that will drive the transition to electric trucking.
I suspect that the Goodenough battery will be more similar to solar panels than to cylindrical cells. It needs thin film deposition (um of Li), and glass doping, both of which are standard processing steps in semiconductor material including solar panels. I think with the solar roof work that Tesla is doing now including building high volume production in GF2, they will be well prepared.Tesla and Panasonic codeveloped custom large scale production processes and equipment for use at the Gigafactory. I believe that most of the additional twenty percent reduction in costs that they said would happen by the end of building Gigafactory One is due to the fact that building subsequent copies of that equipment will cost less and be much faster to build.
The most obvious example is the current pack production bottlenecks. We can count on the fact that they won’t make the same mistakes again. I believe that they will set up assembly lines to build that equipment. They are going to have something like 20-30 cell production lines in each Gigafactory. Multiplied times 4-10 Gigafactories will make that worth while and that will become a substantial moat. An issue is how much of that will need to be redone to accommodate the Goodenaugh cells. That will cost Tesla time and money but they will still (odd are greater than 90%) be way ahead of the competing OEM’s.
These production bottlenecks are a big buying opportunity.
Definitely an advice!
I suspect that the Goodenough battery will be more similar to solar panels than to cylindrical cells. It needs thin film deposition (um of Li), and glass doping, both of which are standard processing steps in semiconductor material including solar panels. I think with the solar roof work that Tesla is doing now including building high volume production in GF2, they will be well prepared.
Are you forgetting the facts that when the Gigafactory is completed that batteries will cost a lot less. The prices for the M3 will be reduced accordingly, but the semi prices we have incorporate those reductions.A back of envelope calculation shows that selling each Semi is a much less profitable proposition for Tesla than selling 13 M3.
The 180K priced Semi will need a 1000 KWh battery. LR M3 at the moment needs a 75 KWh battery. So if you have 1 MWh of Mcells, that is enough for 1 Semi or 13 M3. But if we assume each will have a similar gross margin, say 20% to keep it simple, then the gross profit from 1 Semi is $36K. But gross profit from 13 M3/MY would be $130K (assuming avg price is $50,000). The gross profit to be made from selling 13 M3/MY is 3.5 times the profit from 1 Semi.
I believe that the biggest challenges are building and trouble shooting the first phases of Gigafactory 1 and the first phases of the transition to the Goodenaugh cells.Advancing fast on so many tracks, each requiring huge amounts iof cells to scale (M3, MY, pickup truck, Semi, battery storage) they must believe they will be able to finance and build a large number of GFs quickly enough to keep up with rising volume of all the products that consume them. The number of GF needed to keep up, I think, is larger than what we've imagined up until now. Executing all of those, the right number and timing, is I think going to be a huge challenge. Far larger than anything they've managed to execute so far.
Those will require less space to produce and the production will be faster than coating huge rolls and drying them? Can you provide a reasonably accurate estimate of the increase in production (if any) for Gigafactory 1 if they convert it to production of Goodenaugh cells?I suspect that the Goodenough battery will be more similar to solar panels than to cylindrical cells. It needs thin film deposition (um of Li), and glass doping, both of which are standard processing steps in semiconductor material including solar panels. I think with the solar roof work that Tesla is doing now including building high volume production in GF2, they will be well prepared.
when you say "far fetched"... you mean like this?Reuters is out with a very negative article on the Tesla S/X manufacturing process. Some of the claims seem far fatched, like a huge outdoor parking 'yard' with up to 2000 cars waiting for additional fixes. There should be some independent evidence of this but to my knowledge there is none. Sources are 9 current and former employees of which 5 were fired for cause. Still
Build fast, fix later: speed hurts quality at Tesla, some workers say
Disgruntled fired employees.The good news is that Elon will probably pay more attention to this. Bad news is that there are some disgruntled employees out there
https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose...-model-3-production-defects-fremont-tsla.html
when you say "far fetched"... you mean like this?
Why Are Dozens Of Tesla Model 3, S, And X Sitting In An LA Parking Lot?