stopcrazypp
Well-Known Member
The data may not be proprietary (although there is a possibility that it might be if it was encrypted/encoded and decrypting/decoding would reveal details about how Tesla's system works beyond what reverse engineering can do), but the tools definitely are. If it was something that anyone can easily pull and analyze from the car, then the family would have already done so. It seems the family doesn't want Tesla getting access to the logs at all, but to provide all assistance beyond that to allow a third party access. That's how both statements turn out to be somewhat true even though they seem to contradict each other.What exactly is so proprietary about accessing vehicle log data? Is that supposed to be some big secret? There is no reason at all for Tesla to refuse to an investigation by an independent third party. If someone wanted to access a Tesla all they would have to do is buy one. Nothing truly proprietary there.
And this being China, confidentiality agreements limiting the tools to only being used for this investigation (and not copied and leaked to other unrelated third parties) are likely practically worthless.
Last edited: