The video mentions nothing about Tesla, so not sure what you are going on about. Skipping through it, the end mentions GrowSF, which is a group of Tech workers trying to influence politics in SF and having a grudge with certain supervisors (and unsurprisingly they are using this as a chance to trash certain supervisors even though they have little to do with the concerns brought up by SFMTA). Not that hard to research and it's obvious they are heavily politically biased (just as they claim the opposing side to be).
In conversations with SFGATE, Supervisor Dean Preston and GrowSF co-founder Steven Buss...
www.sfgate.com
Looking through it more, the only stat they analyze on the actual SFMTA letter is the misleading one on the collisions, but fail to acknowledge the primary problem brought up (namely halting incidents increasing drastically after the switch to driverless).
They mention a tweet by a supervisor about incident count being 18 and focus on one incident counted that was not applicable (forgetting of course other incident stats also include incidents that are not the fault of the subject vehicle!), but that neglects that supervisor tweets are irrelevant to the permit approval (CPUC does not consider them). Also does not acknowledge there are plenty of other incidents that are applicable. Part of the request is more data so that it is it is easier to filter out irrelevant incidents.
The later part of the video is all political stuff and promotion of their group.
