Believe what you will about the health effects of EMF and AC, but going RWD on a 3 won't change anything, really. I don't know what your sources are, but Tesla uses AC power for ALL the motors in ALL its cars. In the AWD 3, the front motor is a pure induction motor, while the rear is the same Permanent Magnet Switched Reluctance AC motor that you get in the RWD version.So, I ordered a Performance Model 3 last night, and, after reading about the EMF situation, I'm considering downgrading to a Long Range RWD. Based on what I've read, the AWD versions have an AC motor in the front, so while the EMF levels in a RWD (DC only motor) vehicle are negligible, the EMF from that front AC motor and the EMF required to convert the DC battery power to AC power might be an issue.
I've read everything I can find on the internet on this issue (at least everything Tesla related), so I don't need any "don't worry about EMFs" comments or tinfoil hat jokes. I'm aware that EMFs are probably not carcinogenic, and that there is certainly no good evidence that they are. However, there was also no evidence that radiation in low levels was dangerous at one point (see this article: Radium Girls - Wikipedia), so I'd like to minimize my EMF exposure. If there's even a 10% chance that EMFs are dangerous, I'd prefer to give up the 2 second reduction in 0-60 time rather than expose myself and my family to more than I already do on a daily basis.
Are there any engineers or anyone else knowledgeable out there who could shed some light on the issue?
So, on the EMF front, you MAY see slightly reduced levels with the RWD (one less motor; farther away from the driver), it's not the binary choice that you seem to want.