Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Climate Change / Global Warming Discussion

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.

The Carbon Monitoring done by the ESA Earth Observation Department found out that Brasil was a net carbon sink rather than a net carbon source as it was estimated.
Carbon Emissions of each Country have to be accurately checked if we want to meet the specification of 1.5 degrees Celsius set by the Agreement of Paris for the Temperature Deviation.
CO2 crosses borders so it's a global problem. Good to track emissions by countries but they shouldn't get a pass because of absorption.
 

Let’s face it: climate summits are broken. The delegates talk and talk, while Earth systems slide towards deadly tipping points. Since the climate negotiations began in 1992 more carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels has been released worldwide than in all preceding human history. This year is likely to set a new emissions record. They are talking us to oblivion. Throughout these Conference of the Parties (Cop) summits, fossil fuel lobbyists have swarmed the corridors and meeting rooms. It’s like allowing weapons manufacturers to dominate a peace conference. This year, the lobbyists outnumber all but one of the national delegations. And they’re not the only ones: Cop28 is also heaving with meat and livestock lobbyists and reps from other planet-trashing industries. What should be the most important summit on Earth is treated like a trade fair.

It’s not surprising that the two decisive measures these negotiations should have delivered at the outset – agreements to leave fossil fuels in the ground and to end most livestock farming – have never featured in the final outcome of any Cop summit. Nor should we be astonished that these agreements favour non-solutions such as carbon capture and storage, whose sole purpose is to provide an excuse for inaction.

The result is that the oil states got what they wanted, by default. What “consensus” means is that every nation has a veto: 198 delegates can agree to a measure, but it can be blocked by the 199th. The most lethal interests prevail, by design.

However we do it, we need to break the power of the Earth-devouring industries before they break us. Otherwise, we will keep watching as yet another year is wasted, yet another of our last chances scorches and shrivels. Soon, there will be no years left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raffy.Roma

The Opec oil cartel has warned its member countries with “utmost urgency” that “pressure against fossil fuels may reach a tipping point with irreversible consequences” at Cop28, in leaked letters seen by the Guardian. The letters noted that a “fossil fuels phase out” remains on the negotiating table at the UN climate summit and urges the oil states to “proactively reject any text or formula that targets energy, ie fossil fuels, rather than emissions”.

These letters show that fossil fuel interests are starting to realise that the writing is on the wall for dirty energy,” said Mohamed Adow, of the NGO and thinktank Power Shift Africa. “Climate change is killing poor people around the globe and these petrostates don’t want Cop28 to phase out fossil fuels because it will hurt their short-term profits. It’s shameful. “The reality is, if the world is going to save itself, it cannot be held back by a small band of countries that control the world’s oil supply. As well as saving us from climate change, a renewable-powered world is also one where energy is dispersed and democratised. Fossil fuels keep power in the hands of the few that happen to have them.”

The petrostates prefer to focus on emissions, rather than the fossil fuels themselves, saying that carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology could stop the CO2 reaching the atmosphere. However, Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency, said recently that CCS technology will never scale up to cover the emissions of the oil and gas sector if they carry on with business as usual: “It’s a fantasy, an illusion.” Heavy dependence on CCS to reach net zero targets around 2050 would also be “highly economically damaging”, costing at least $30tn more than a renewable energy route, according to a report published on 4 December by University of Oxford researchers.
 

Let’s face it: climate summits are broken. The delegates talk and talk, while Earth systems slide towards deadly tipping points. Since the climate negotiations began in 1992 more carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels has been released worldwide than in all preceding human history. This year is likely to set a new emissions record. They are talking us to oblivion. Throughout these Conference of the Parties (Cop) summits, fossil fuel lobbyists have swarmed the corridors and meeting rooms. It’s like allowing weapons manufacturers to dominate a peace conference. This year, the lobbyists outnumber all but one of the national delegations. And they’re not the only ones: Cop28 is also heaving with meat and livestock lobbyists and reps from other planet-trashing industries. What should be the most important summit on Earth is treated like a trade fair.

It’s not surprising that the two decisive measures these negotiations should have delivered at the outset – agreements to leave fossil fuels in the ground and to end most livestock farming – have never featured in the final outcome of any Cop summit. Nor should we be astonished that these agreements favour non-solutions such as carbon capture and storage, whose sole purpose is to provide an excuse for inaction.

The result is that the oil states got what they wanted, by default. What “consensus” means is that every nation has a veto: 198 delegates can agree to a measure, but it can be blocked by the 199th. The most lethal interests prevail, by design.

However we do it, we need to break the power of the Earth-devouring industries before they break us. Otherwise, we will keep watching as yet another year is wasted, yet another of our last chances scorches and shrivels. Soon, there will be no years left.

That's why I agree with former Vice President Al Gore who said that the annual United Nations COP climate summits need to be reformed so that petrostates don’t wield so much power over the final outcome.
 
California’s 2020 Solar Mandate requires all newly built homes to install solar photovoltaic systems. These requirements are based on the floor area of the home and the climate zone.

The solar panel systems must be sized to provide for the full annual energy usage of the home. In order to increase home energy efficiency, it’s expected that sizes will generally range between 2.7 kilowatts and 5.7 kilowatts under the new Title 24 requirements. These average system sizes take into consideration the fact that new homes will also include other technology that will enable them to be more energy-efficient overall.
There you have it; thanks mspohr.

I guess I must have been thinking about something else...
 

Not a good news!

We will have COP29 in Azerbaijan. The decision means the conference of the 198 parties will be held in an autocratic fossil-fuel producing nation for the third year in a row.

It looks like Russia has some responsability in this decision of Azerbaijan hosting COP29. Think that the UN should have prevented this happened.
 

It looks like Russia has some responsability in this decision of Azerbaijan hosting COP29. Think that the UN should have prevented this happened.

Azerbaijan gets two-thirds of its revenue from oil and gas, one of the highest percentages in the world and more than the Cop28 host – the United Arab Emirates.

So after COP28 and the opposition of the United Arab Emirates to the phaseout of fossil fuels what we expect at COP29 will happen?
 

Azerbaijan gets two-thirds of its revenue from oil and gas, one of the highest percentages in the world and more than the Cop28 host – the United Arab Emirates.

So after COP28 and the opposition of the United Arab Emirates to the phaseout of fossil fuels what we expect at COP29 will happen?

Azerbaijan gets two-thirds of its revenue from oil and gas, one of the highest percentages in the world and more than the Cop28 host – the United Arab Emirates.

So after COP28 and the opposition of the United Arab Emirates to the phaseout of fossil fuels what we expect at COP29 will happen?
But the decision of having COP29 in Azerbaijan also got positive remarks.

But there was relief from some that a decision had been reached. “It is good that the uncertainty over who will host Cop29 is over. It means that plans can now be made coming out of Cop28, for the key years of 2024 and 2025 when new climate targets have to be tabled by all countries,” said Kaveh Guilanpour, the vice-president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.

So let's hope that COP29 in Azerbaijan will produce positive results for mankind.
 

The UK’s former climate chief has warned that failure to agree a phase-out of fossil fuels at the UN Cop28 climate summit would push the world beyond the crucial 1.5C temperature limit and into climate breakdown.

So my worries were founded.
Think that if we will fail to phase out fossil fuels at COP28, since Azerbaijan gets two-thirds of its revenue from oil and gas, one of the highest percentages in the world and more than the COP28 host – the United Arab Emirates, we will have a domino effect and we will fail to phase out fossil fuels at COP29 in Azerbaijan too.
This is a matter having to do with the safety of the whole world.
Under these conditions the UN should intervene IMO.
 
Last edited:
Think that if we will fail to phase out fossil fuels at COP28, since Azerbaijan gets two-thirds of its revenue from oil and gas, one of the highest percentages in the world and more than the COP28 host – the United Arab Emirates, we will have a domino effect and we will fail to phase out fossil fuels at COP29 in Azerbaijan too.
This is a matter having to do with the safety of the whole world.
Under these conditions the UN should intervene IMO.

The question of whether the final agreement from COP28 includes a call for a “phase-out” or “phase-down” of fossil fuels is seen by many as being the single most important indicator of success at the UN summit.
Actually the "phase-down" (reductions of fossil fuels burning) is preparatory to the "phase-out". In fact we cannot stop burning fossil fuels suddenly.
Main thing IMO is to set a date, for instance 2050, for the "phase-out".
It will be important also to establish what percentage of Carbon Emissions will be cut in the intermediate stages.
We are looking for what the final agreement will be at COP28.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mspohr

NASA is working with others to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 thanks to new green aviation technologies. These include innovative aircraft shapes, electrified propulsion, and others intended to make flight more sustainable.

The whole transportation is responsible for 50% of oil used. We have to reduce the use of fossil fuels for transportation as soon as possible (phase-down) and get net zero emissions by 2050 (phase-out).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mspohr
Pure evil


Saudi Arabia, the world’s leading exporter of oil, has become the biggest obstacle to an agreement at the United Nations climate summit in Dubai, where countries are debating whether to call for a phaseout of fossil fuels in order to fight global warming, negotiators and other officials said. The Saudi delegation has flatly opposed any language in a deal that would even mention fossil fuels — the oil, gas and coal that, when burned, create emissions that are dangerously heating the planet.
Saudi negotiators have also objected to a provision, endorsed by at least 118 countries, aimed at tripling global renewable energy capacity by 2030
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raffy.Roma
Pure evil


Saudi Arabia, the world’s leading exporter of oil, has become the biggest obstacle to an agreement at the United Nations climate summit in Dubai, where countries are debating whether to call for a phaseout of fossil fuels in order to fight global warming, negotiators and other officials said. The Saudi delegation has flatly opposed any language in a deal that would even mention fossil fuels — the oil, gas and coal that, when burned, create emissions that are dangerously heating the planet.
Saudi negotiators have also objected to a provision, endorsed by at least 118 countries, aimed at tripling global renewable energy capacity by 2030

No way. Former Vice President Al Gore is absolutely CORRECT!
The annual United Nations COP climate summits need to be reformed so that petrostates don’t wield so much power.
We cannot depend upon the interests of Single States to work out the Climate Change issue.
This is a matter which has to be discussed and solved at the UN.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mspohr

No way. Former Vice President Al Gore is absolutely CORRECT!
The annual United Nations COP climate summits need to be reformed so that petrostates don’t wield so much power.
We cannot depend upon the interests of Single States to work out the Climate Change issue.
This is a matter which has to be discussed and solved at the UN.

This is a matter concerning the safety of the whole world. So the UN Security Council has to give directions on this matter IMO. Hopefully Saudi Arabia is not in the Security Council.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mspohr