We will miss you perhaps, recover soonIt is time to reopen.
The data does not support initial death rate reports.
Quarantine the sick, not the well.
Best wishes for a speedy recovery
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We will miss you perhaps, recover soonIt is time to reopen.
The data does not support initial death rate reports.
Quarantine the sick, not the well.
COVID-19: Data - NYC Health
9,101 + 4,582 = 13,683 deaths
13,683 / 8.4 million = 0.163% mortality in New York City, as of April 20, 2:30pm.
EDIT: A common assumption is that even with "probable deaths", there is still an undercounting of deaths.
In New York City, mortality, deaths per population, today crossed the 0.2% mark:
COVID-19: Data - NYC Health
(11,708 + 5,228) / 8.4 million.
It was 0.13% not so long ago.
Since not everyone is infected (yet), true IFR in NYC must be a multiple of 0.2%, refuting any theory that claimed unknown infections are so high that we could reach herd immunity we less than 0.2% fatality. With hard evidence, not speculation or estimates.
To be fair:How about deaths per 1M population.
View attachment 536701
BTW According to IHME Sweden is on pace for 14,608 deaths which is equivalent to 481k US deaths.
So, what you are saying is that IHME are a bunch of dumbasses?
Correct. There was never any money to be made in a coronavirus vaccine, until now of course. Scientists were close to a coronavirus vaccine years ago. Then the money dried up.
Here is a summary of NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital's update from yesterday:
"Covid 5,521 patient discharges
Snapshot: 1,879 patients Friday, 674 on vents. Today: 1,753 and 614 on vents.
Testing:
Patients- we are currently testing all patients that are being admitted whether or not they have symptoms, and prior to any procedures.
Healthcare workers- anyone that has symptoms can be tested with PCR test. We are looking at expanding testing for Healthcare workers who have been in direct contact with patients.
Antibody test: currently available to healthcare workers who have had symptoms and recovered more than 14 days ago.
We are in good supply with PPE. Keep conserving and follow guidelines for don and doff.
Masks should be NIOSH certified for N95 masks. Be aware of counterfeit masks!"
I think the main problem with this calc is that it does not correct for the fraction of people infected during the period under study who have not yet, but will die from their Covid infection.In New York City, mortality, deaths per population, today crossed the 0.2% mark:
COVID-19: Data - NYC Health
(11,708 + 5,228) / 8.4 million.
That looks like a plateau, not a down trending, based upon your previous posts of number of patients on a vent. Is that correct?
I think the main problem with this calc is that it does not correct for the fraction of people infected during the period under study who have not yet, but will die from their Covid infection.
I do the following:
1. Take the cum deaths as of 8 - 10 days after the serology study
2. Add 20% of current hospitalizations
(1)+(2) divided into the seropositive population. This works out to ~ 1% IFR for NYC
The snapshot compares Friday's 674 on vents to monday's 614. To me, for at least that short period of time, is a downtrend. Maybe you are looking at a larger epoch.
Anyone see the idea of giving people nicotine patch to help prevent COVID-19? Sounds fishy. What are your thoughts?
No, I definitely got that part rightDid you accidentally quote the wrong post?
His calc is a lower bound, as if the entire pop was already infected. The serology study is used to normalize the deaths to the entire population.He was referring to overall population mortality, not IFR - so it has no relation the the serology study.
Thankfully, no.Remember when Doctors used to advocate smoking because of Tobacco lobbying.