N5329K
Active Member
Yes. Go here and skip to 1:39.Any references? I was reading on mechanism of action in
Hydroxychloroquine - Wikipedia
Robin
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. Go here and skip to 1:39.Any references? I was reading on mechanism of action in
Hydroxychloroquine - Wikipedia
At some point, the countries prioritizing a low death toll will be at an economic disadvantage to the countries that prioritize herd immunity at the cost of a high death toll. When the public realizes that, you’ll see one country after the other switch to the herd immunity strategy.A follow-up to my previous comment: I misquoted the Norwegian newspaper article, which was admittedly unclear. Norway is closing its airports and ports indefinitely, to foreign visitors that don't have a pressing need to enter the country. This is in a different league than a blanket ban on travel for a month. It is expected that the measures will be re-evaluated soon.
Regarding your comments and questions of the future, Fact Checking: My guess at this point is that most countries will let the pandemic run its course over the next year or two, but at different speeds, proportional to the measures taken to slow down the spread. Lots of deaths along the way, maybe 0.1% of the diseased in a relatively optimistic case. Probably some more catastrophes like Italy. Then herd immunity will be established, due to previously infected persons having a lower probability of catching the disease again. This will inhibit future outbreaks from turning into full-scale epidemics, and we will have a future that largely looks like today, but with a massively increased respect for the chaos and risk of a pandemic.
No strong opinion on the effects on the economy, it might trigger a financial crisis. Or not.
If any countries are able/willing to contain the spread to such a degree that only a minority of the population will have caught the disease, they will have to keep extreme vigilance indefinitely, or at least until a vaccine is available. My guess is that the patience for such strict measures will eventually wear out, and they will gradually join the first group. Or vaccinate everyone, with the same result.
Such vigilance would necessarily impact trading, and especially tourism, massively.
A follow-up to my previous comment: I misquoted the Norwegian newspaper article, which was admittedly unclear. Norway is closing its airports and ports indefinitely, to foreign visitors that don't have a pressing need to enter the country. This is in a different league than a blanket ban on travel for a month. It is expected that the measures will be re-evaluated soon.
Regarding your comments and questions of the future, Fact Checking: My guess at this point is that most countries will let the pandemic run its course over the next year or two, but at different speeds, proportional to the measures taken to slow down the spread. Lots of deaths along the way, maybe 0.1% of the diseased in a relatively optimistic case. Probably some more catastrophes like Italy. Then herd immunity will be established, due to previously infected persons having a lower probability of catching the disease again. This will inhibit future outbreaks from turning into full-scale epidemics, and we will have a future that largely looks like today, but with a massively increased respect for the chaos and risk of a pandemic.
No strong opinion on the effects on the economy, it might trigger a financial crisis. Or not.
If any countries are able/willing to contain the spread to such a degree that only a minority of the population will have caught the disease, they will have to keep extreme vigilance indefinitely, or at least until a vaccine is available. My guess is that the patience for such strict measures will eventually wear out, and they will gradually join the first group. Or vaccinate everyone, with the same result.
Such vigilance would necessarily impact trading, and especially tourism, massively.
There must be game theory simulations for this!At some point, the countries prioritizing a low death toll will be at an economic disadvantage to the countries that prioritize herd immunity at the cost of a high death toll. When the public realizes that, you’ll see one country after the other switch to the herd immunity strategy.
Unless some cure or vaccination can be found. The economic value of a medical solution to this problem will be massive.
I'm wondering what people's thoughts are about the "endgame": how is the post-pandemic world going to look like?
On one side there will be countries with successful containment efforts; China, South Korea, Taiwan, maybe Switzerland and Scandinavian countries.
There will also be other countries with an uncontrolled outbreak: the U.S., U.K.
How will the two sides trade, interact and have a tourism industry? If the infection can linger for months in difficult to test organs, the border closures won't be lifted.
If people can still infect each other there will be pockets of uninfected in each of the pandemic countries.
A SARS vaccine was never developed despite years of trying.
Unless there's total eradication of the virus I don't see how trust in social interactions can return.
Obviously such an outcome would be devastating to the world economy.
If any1 needs a good netflix show during all this craziness, check out the Kindness Diaries
I'm wondering what people's thoughts are about the "endgame": how is the post-pandemic world going to look like?
On one side there will be countries with successful containment efforts; China, South Korea, Taiwan, maybe Switzerland and Scandinavian countries.
There will also be other countries with an uncontrolled outbreak: the U.S., U.K.
How will the two sides trade, interact and have a tourism industry? If the infection can linger for months in difficult to test organs, the border closures won't be lifted.
If people can still infect each other there will be pockets of uninfected in each of the pandemic countries.
A SARS vaccine was never developed despite years of trying.
Unless there's total eradication of the virus I don't see how trust in social interactions can return.
Obviously such an outcome would be devastating to the world economy.
Numbers in Europe getting scary.
I signed up yesterday, and am waiting for the test kit to arrive.
An important parameter is the hospital capacity. If all get sick at the same time, many die. If the same number get sick over a longer period, not so many die because they can be treated while alive. Crucial difference!1) Why are you differentiating countries with good containment efforts vs. others? It will produce better short term results if the bad containment countries have worse outcomes because of a higher pulse and insufficient supplies/beds/hospital resources, but I don’t get how that affects things going forward? Even good containment countries are going to have a substantial portion of the population get it when containment is relaxed. It’s just a shallower curve, but the same area underneath.
2) one of the experts from the Sam Harris podcast I linked earlier, believes we will have a vaccine that works in 12-18 months, that will be a one-time vaccine unlike the flu vaccine.
My guess would be that going forward we’ll just become more cognizant of good hygiene, and hopefully far better prepared for the next pandemic.
Another thing that expert said was that he believed it was primarily transmitted through sneezing and coughing. I had also read that talking could possibly transmit it, but he did not mention that. If sneezing and/or coughing is the primary transmission mechanism, why aren’t the articles, experts, government... talking about the importance of sneezing or coughing into your sleeve or a tissue. And immediately avoiding someone and calling them out, when they do not do this. Wouldn’t this be the most effective measure we could take?
It will be very interesting to find out why C19 is not resulting in 0-10 age deaths. This might lead to a huge breakthrough in vaccine technology.
Kids are home from the shut down colleges, so we had to go grocery shopping. Wow. Scared people are scary. I've never seen this ever in America. Shelves were empty, hundreds of people in line at a grocery store near us at 6 am this morning.
Prior to the Kuwait invasion, and post 9/11 both saw hoarding but nothing like today. I guess whoever wanted everybody scared to death got their wish. There are no reported deaths in this area, and <10 cases out of 8,000,000 people.
Massive increase in deaths will likely dissuade most countries who did low death toll from switching to herd immunity. I mean I doubt anyone is looking at Iran digging mass graves and thinking they should emulate Iran. Well except the UK I guess. They are absolutely insane but the world thanks them for their sacrifice by testing the limits of their NHS with a let everyone die and see how it goes strategy.At some point, the countries prioritizing a low death toll will be at an economic disadvantage to the countries that prioritize herd immunity at the cost of a high death toll. When the public realizes that, you’ll see one country after the other switch to the herd immunity strategy.
Unless some cure or vaccination can be found. The economic value of a medical solution to this problem will be massive.
Have we officially determined that there is a severe strain and a mild strain of Coronavirus? Can anyone speak with confidence on that?
I hope Trump will practice that "love one another" stuff.
Which is why Tesla, of all car companies, is sitting pretty. They have a huge backlog of Model Y sales to deliver in the US, as well as Model 3 in China.
Even good containment countries are going to have a substantial portion of the population get it when containment is relaxed. It’s just a shallower curve, but the same area underneath.
Probably one of Trump's staffs told him Verily, a Google company, will do the portal for us, and he just call it Google. Same as calling Tim Cook Tim Apple because he runs AppleI’m curious to know who told who in the WH about what Google, more accurately Alphabet’s Verily arm, is working on and when.
Is that a positive ... uh ... good thing?Trump took the COVID-19 test. Highest score ever.
I signed up yesterday, and am waiting for the test kit to arrive.