dhanson865
Well-Known Member
This one is on wikipedia and hasn't been updated recently, does anyone feel like finding the updated copy from the Italian source?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great info. I was starting to think it was going to be a slow day for actual science.
Detect COVID-19 in as Little as 5 Minutes
Did a quick hunt on what kind of test this is, and it is a point-of-care PCR test. They sensitivity and specificity for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and this test isn't published, but here is the link for that data for their Flu A/B test:
ID NOW Influenza A & B 2 - Alere is now Abbott
Should be a reliable test. Sadly, they are only stating a production capacity of 5 million tests per month in April.
@UrsS - you going to grow a pair and join in the conversation, or just keep armchair quarterbacking and clicking "disagree" ?
Asking for a friend.
They are probably kicking themselves for spending all their money on an arsenal large enough to invade a small country.
.
I'm pretty sure right now the rich and well connected are disproportionately infected. Traveling all around the world and having a large social circle is not good if you're trying to avoid a novel virus.I would love to see some data collected based on income, education level, and geography on how this pandemic is evolving in the USA.
I’ve never participated in this forum before, so I apologize if I’m doing this wrong. I just wanted to say that this is the most cogent explanation have seen and if I had permission and the knowledge of how to post it on Facebook I would. And thank you.
and when you think of 1812 we can’t forget there’s no comparison to the level of medical care that we have now over back then and still how many deaths are anticipated from CV.
Going on 4 WFH weeks as of Monday and being in the higher risk group I can’t help but wonder about getting it despite all this time plus additional weeks that I see in our future once other areas intermingle earlier than they should. Without some vaccine (best 12-18 months away) or some possible antibody treatment can’t say I feel encouraged by what I’m seeing from State and Federal governments. The medical breakthrough will come when they do and not before.
Heck we still have yet to find paper goods in the store when my husband has gone out.
Measles yes, Covid19 no. sooner or later group immunity will kick in, once 60% (or so) of the population is vaccinated or survived, it will be difficult for the Covid19
I heard today that the local Grocery Outlet had a lot of TP. I was in Costco earlier this week and they had a mountain of paper towels.
Don't put words into my mouth. Did I say I liked the current system? Did you forget to read the rest of this thread and see how much I LOATHE insurance companies?
Stop reading your personal preferences and prejudices into my post. If I want to say something, I'm always clear about it and don't mince words.
Single payer in this country would be a DISASTER for the following reasons:
1) you will see doctors retire in droves. This is not a guess on my part, this is well established given the insanely low reimbursement rates that Medicare currently pays for office visits.
2) you will see rationing of care because of #1 - Canada and the UK already have this and it's not called "rationing" it's called "extended wait times to see a specialist". Literally, costs are kept down because some of the sickest people in the system (that would use up the resources) cannot get the care they need in time before dying. This is evidenced by higher mortality rates in these countries for various diseases (see my post several pages back about cancers).
3) the US Government is HORRIBLY inefficient in everything it touches. So inefficient that the cost of care would probably go UP, instead of DOWN.
- When I was a medical student some of the WORST care I ever saw was in the VA medical system. That's 100% government run, and should be looked at CLOSELY as to how a bureaucratic system would run healthcare. I literally showed up for work one day at a VA facility and had a nurse look me square in the eyes and refuse to draw blood on a patient because she had "met her quota for the day".
I really don't trust the Chinese numbers. Too many videos of Wuhan welding doors shut to trust Chinese numbers
there must be many many deaths in China not recorded because they occurred outside of a hospital facility.
I posted this earlier, but clearly folks missed it.
Coronavirus
In any case, I see you calling it a PCR test. But they say they use enzymes, rather than thermal cycling to let the rna stands multiply. Is it still considered a RT PCR? I do see they try to distinguish themselves from PCR. So questioning your assertion.
View attachment 526681
What about those who are asymptomatic carriers (or the SARS survivors)? Would they not be considered "immune", since Norbert's question wasn't about transmitting the virus?
The last number I got from my contacts (before the greatest chinese firewall kicks in and everyone went dark) was that the actual numbers are 10x the infected and 6x the death.
To be honest, I've been steadily losing my Chinese contacts over the years as less and less of them want to risk having their social credit decrease. Many of them have lost their access to travel outside the country or to the more "special" places like Canada or the western nations. I've had to fly to some of the more far away countries that are easier for them to get approval for in order to meet them.
I think after this, I won't be able to get in touch with any of them.
I saw a paper on detection of covid-19 virus. The problem apparently is not the PCR test - but sample collection method. Not conclusive - but indicative of problems with virus detection.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762997
There were 1070 specimens collected from 205 patients with COVID-19 who were a mean age of 44 years (range, 5-67 years) and 68% male. Most of the patients presented with fever, dry cough, and fatigue; 19% of patients had severe illness. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens showed the highest positive rates (14 of 15; 93%), followed by sputum (72 of 104; 72%), nasal swabs (5 of 8; 63%), fibrobronchoscope brush biopsy (6 of 13; 46%), pharyngeal swabs (126 of 398; 32%), feces (44 of 153; 29%), and blood (3 of 307; 1%). None of the 72 urine specimens tested positive (Table).
Just did a web search of Walgreen locations near me (they show in store stock) and yep, 8 stores have TP in stock. I expected it'd take 2 weeks for things to normalize. Will see if I am right this weekend.
As I am sure you know, you don't have to do very many random samples to extrapolate. However with the severe shortage of tests it is probably not adviseable to take any random samples, much less the 200 - 1,500 I assume would be needed for a well designed and well executed regional or even national test. We probably have no tests to spare for this yet as they are needed just to use on people with symptoms.
Wow. Thanks for the info.
Communism . . . sucks.