To me it’s more worth it if the package increases acceleration overall, not only the 0-60.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just going to play the devil's advocate here and save people some money. Ask yourself, do I really need a half a tick 0-60mph time decrease for TWO GRAND? If the answer is yes, then go for it and be happy. If not, IMO, it's money better spent if you put it towards a quality coilover suspension system.
MY is faster than 90-95% crossovers/SUVs out there as it is (even faster than some of those AMG or M tuned Euros that cost $100k+).
So to be sure I'm understanding what you're saying, your advice is that if I want it and think the price is fair, I should get it, but if I don't want it or I don't think the price is fair, I should not get it?Just going to play the devil's advocate here and save people some money. Ask yourself, do I really need a half a tick 0-60mph time decrease for TWO GRAND? If the answer is yes, then go for it and be happy. If not, IMO, it's money better spent if you put it towards a quality coilover suspension system.
MY is faster than 90-95% crossovers/SUVs out there as it is (even faster than some of those AMG or M tuned Euros that cost $100k+).
Nope. Wasn't an advice to being with. Simply my opinion as to where I would spend the 2 G's.So to be sure I'm understanding what you're saying, your advice is that if I want it and think the price is fair, I should get it, but if I don't want it or I don't think the price is fair, I should not get it?
Oh -- sorry. I thought when you started with, "ask yourself," it was you passing on advice. My bad.Nope. Wasn't an advice to being with. Simply my opinion as to where I would spend the 2 G's.
Yes. I'm measuring 162 kW from the front motor after the purchase.I think it wakes up the front motor, correct?
Tesla under-reports their numbers. The MYP is measuring over 623 hp. I believe the figure shown is the energy pulled from the battery to the inverters and there are some drivetrain losses from the moving parts.You have a LR AWD, correct? 162 kW (front) + 217.50 kW (rear) = 380 kW total = 510 HP.
That doesn't seem right? I thought the AWD was ~400HP peak and Performance was ~500 HP peak?
Unless the power reported on the app is the power pulled from the battery into the motor inverters, and the actual inverter output to the motors is less. (but can it really be 100HP loss in power?)
Tesla under-reports their numbers. The MYP is measuring over 660hp. I believe the figure shown is the energy pulled from the battery to the inverters and there are some drivetrain losses from the moving parts.
Yeah, it should be 623. I was just going off memory.Do you have a source for the Performance 660HP number?
Most articles I read refer to 500HP peak (or less) for Performance:
Amazing Tesla Model Y Performance Dyno Test Results: Over 500HP!
Tesla Model Y Long Range vs. Performance: Which Is the Better Buy?
There's this article that show 469 kW / 623 HP, but it's via OBDII, not wheel HP:
Tesla Model Y has a more powerful powertrain than Model 3, test shows - Electrek
Losses are in the motor (bearings, windage)Yes, where? Since direct drive and no transmission, those losses from motor to wheels should be non-existent. So is this energy from battery? Or energy output from the inverters into the motors? Because I do not think it is energy out of motors to the wheels.
Best I have seen is where they dyno'ed at the wheels and measured a peak of 502 HP, first link the post previous to this one.
All Model S and X vehicles now benefit from Tesla’s latest generation of drive unit technology, which combines an optimized permanent magnet synchronous reluctance motor, silicon carbide power electronics, and improved lubrication, cooling, bearings, and gear designs to achieve greater than 93% efficiency.