Ok. Got it.Nope.
My argument is there's still no evidence it's a buyable L5 car for $37,000.
All we have a is press release, of a future vehicle they "hope" to have in "limited testing" next year and almost certainly heavily geofenced, and not for sale at any price to a customer.
Because that's what the actual facts are here.
So citing it as an example of someone offering a cheap L5 consumer-buyable car is weird since it's literally none of those things presently and we have no evidence it will be one anytime soon.
Right now, nobody has an L5 car. At any price.
A very few companies have L4 cars, that are very very heavily geofenced and still don't work at scale, and are not actually for sale to the public at all (and would cost a lot more than $37,000 if they were).
Just about every company on earth, in both the EV and autonomy space, continually makes future promises they never meet (or are at least many years beyond when they originally claimed they'd meet them). Tesla is hardly alone there.
But where is your basis for the $250k number?
And show your work.
Thnx