Numbers are real, but their perceived effectiveness may be BS. Elon thinks Twitter's BS too but less BS?. Who knows, hence he is conducting an experiment.
So when you previously wrote:
"Elon seems to be basing his actions off best available data."
You meant he looked at available data, didn't believe it, then just made up a completely nonsense claim that says the opposite of the data and presetend it as fact regarding twitters click through ranking.
And even appear to admit his claim was...the opposite of based on best data...here:
So yeah Elon will need to sell a lot of snake oil until he gets enough subs[/URL]
BTW, at least some of the sources that were used to debunk Elons claims were not from "consulting firms that help companies do research on their effectiveness are mostly working for ad companies"
There's companies whose only business is monitoring web traffic and clicks, that have been around for decades doing ONLY that job. And their #s largely line up with others on this.
So that's a helluva conspiracy at this point if you think ALL those numbers are fake.
None of that means the ads are effective in making anyone BUY anything- but Elon said 0 about -that- he was specifically talking about generating clicks and made an outrageous claim that even you now seem to admit was the opposite of "based off best available data"
He seems to have done the same with his "Others have 3000 people on their self driving AI teams" claim which many have already debunked as well.
I have no doubt Tesla has a brilliant team that engineer-for-engineer is way better than anybody else in this space.
But he's again projecting hilariously wrong numbers onto the situation without any data to support it.
Which is.... not what I expect from Elon, but seems a growing trend.