You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not going to have a motor issue on a 90D. Agree that 95k miles on a 2015 is low, not high. 2015 90 is going to be a first gen 90 HV which is sketchy.95k miles on a 2015 is NOT high miles so there may be some issues since it wasn't driven a lot.
If it had 150k-180k miles I'd say hell yeah buy it and don't look back.
But with low mileage like that you're probably gonna have a motor go out soon along with other things failing
My 2014 P85D rear motor lasted till 172k miles. But now I'm seeing this potential buy car is a non-P model so it just has 2 of the small cantaloupe motors not the 2 watermelon butted to each other and 1 cantaloupe motors.Not going to have a motor issue on a 90D. Agree that 95k miles on a 2015 is low, not high. 2015 90 is going to be a first gen 90 HV which is sketchy.
Low mileage on an older car is bad for any Tesla. The lower the mileage on older cars the more prone they are to things breaking from lack of useSo low mileage is a bad thing for a 90D?
Ah OK, thanks for the insight!Low mileage on an older car is bad for any Tesla. The lower the mileage on older cars the more prone they are to things breaking from lack of use
spoke too soonfeels like OP has left the chat
i think this theory is mostly for HV/LDU issues...I think the thought was that early (2012-14) cars that were pampered and had very little mileage were the ones that were having multiple issues later on when they were out of warranty... the early cars that were driven into the ground had the issues addressed promptly by Tesla and then ended up being remarkably reliable (notable exception: HV battery). This was attributed to Tesla being a novice at high volume production at the time... Not sure if that argument holds up now or even after 2015