245 miles of rated range @ 90% is awesome.
My S85 is almost 3 years old, 56K miles: at 100% charge is can barely achieve 246 miles of rated range.
He paid for 256 and lost most of it quickly. Not awesome IMHO.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
245 miles of rated range @ 90% is awesome.
My S85 is almost 3 years old, 56K miles: at 100% charge is can barely achieve 246 miles of rated range.
We are only on week 2 with the car but our range is higher then most people we have spoken to. Just did a 100% charge, we where told by SC when we picked up that the battery has some silicone in it and one of the last classics built in march, If my math is right we are 290 miles. If I change to "ideal" we go well past 365 miles... also I am and have been very hard on the "go" button the last 2 weeks so being efficient was low on the agenda..... love this thing!
I did, look earlier in the thread.Can you take a picture of your battery sticker? Behind front passenger wheel on the side of the battery.
Huh? No Superchargers in your area, Mr. Dallas?Oh, if I only had a passel of Superchargers on my horizon, or better yet my doorstep.
Lacking that, I have just had to make due with the charging resources at hand (sometimes not so handy or speedy).
Maybe for my next car some Superchargers will be more plentiful and closer.
245 miles of rated range @ 90% is awesome.
My S85 is almost 3 years old, 56K miles: at 100% charge is can barely achieve 246 miles of rated range.
What about the cyclone wheels? The new slipstream looks like the cyclone but a bit duller.The new "base" wheels are more aerodynamic than the previous ones. Nothing beats the old "Aero" wheels, though![]()
Huh? No Superchargers in your area, Mr. Dallas?
I've been concerned for some time about the 90kWh pack, as adding silicon to a LiIon battery causes it to degrade much quicker. Should have a much shorter lifetime than older packs.
I was hoping I'm wrong and I can't believe that Tesla would do that, but so far it's not looking too good. Time will tell.
It is a characteristic of silicon-modified cells to degrade rather quickly. I thought maybe Tesla had overcome this when they came out with the 90 pack, but it's looking like the 90's are degrading to 85 capacity so far. Concerning.
They aren't using enough silicon to matter that much. It is a partial silicon anode, not a full silicon anode, which is why the increase in capacity is only moderate.It is a characteristic of silicon-modified cells to degrade rather quickly. I thought maybe Tesla had overcome this when they came out with the 90 pack, but it's looking like the 90's are degrading to 85 capacity so far. Concerning.
This is not theory or speculation. It is a fact about silicon-modified LiIon cells that they degrade quickly. True those with less anode silicon degrade less quickly, but still alot faster than without.Some are some aren't. I don't think you can make a general statement like that without a) good data b) knowledge of how those that have rapid degradation are discharging and balancing their packs c) impact of recent firmware on rated range. The jury is still out IMO.
This is not theory or speculation. It is a fact about silicon-modified LiIon cells that they degrade quickly. True those with less anode silicon degrade less quickly, but still alot faster than without.
I was just thinking out loud above and don't intend to research this for you.