Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Hydrogen vs. Battery

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
BTW, isn't the energy efficiency battery vs [hydrogen] more like three times more efficient?
I worked through the calculation somewhere before (probably in this thread). The answer is, of course, it depends...
  • Well-to-wheels, BEV is three to four times more efficient than HFCV if the hydrogen is produced through electrolysis and assuming the same source of electricity as used to charge the BEV.
  • If, however, the hydrogen is produced through SMR at the refinery and the electricity to charge the BEV comes from a natural gas power plant (basically both sourced through natural gas), then the well-to-wheels efficiency is roughly the same. Minor tweaks in the assumptions can push it one way or the other, but it's basically close.
So often you'll hear hydrogen advocates say that HFCVs are as efficient as BEVs, which is conditionally true. But once they mention production through renewable energy, their efficiency comparison becomes immediately false and they lose to BEVs by a factor of three.
 
...So often you'll hear hydrogen advocates say that HFCVs are as efficient as BEVs, which is conditionally true....

These same people leave out that they are essentially the middleman that converts an energy source to an energy carrier and charge you for it over and over. With a BEV you have already paid for the carrier with the car so you can just pay for the source directly.
 
I worked through the calculation somewhere before (probably in this thread). The answer is, of course, it depends...
  • Well-to-wheels, BEV is three to four times more efficient than HFCV if the hydrogen is produced through electrolysis and assuming the same source of electricity as used to charge the BEV.
  • If, however, the hydrogen is produced through SMR at the refinery and the electricity to charge the BEV comes from a natural gas power plant (basically both sourced through natural gas), then the well-to-wheels efficiency is roughly the same. Minor tweaks in the assumptions can push it one way or the other, but it's basically close.
So often you'll hear hydrogen advocates say that HFCVs are as efficient as BEVs, which is conditionally true. But once they mention production through renewable energy, their efficiency comparison becomes immediately false and they lose to BEVs by a factor of three.

Thanks for digging into it! 3-4 times (when using source-neutral electricity) was also the number I remember from elsewhere. This speaks strongly in favor of BEVs, and increases the importance of a combined argument for renewable energy and EVs. Fortunately it appears that solar reaches grid parity in about the same time frame as (B)EV technology starts to become relevant for the mass-market.
 
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY - Wheels Blog - NYTimes.com
...Toyota FCV-R concept, a hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle...
wheels-fcvr-blog480.jpg

FCV-R | The 42nd Tokyo Motor Show 2011
 
Fuel cells have the unique ability to strip hydrogen atoms of their electrons and venture capitalists of their money.



Since the beginning of fuel cell technology in the mid-nineteenth century, not a single commercial, pure-play fuel cell company has had a profitable year.*

This. I'm afraid we have a long way to go before we see this technology commercially available on a large scale.
 
Last edited:
That confirms other sources, both theoretical and practical. In fact it is slightly worse that another electrolyser I saw, but the same ballpark.

Now you see why people here are so anti-hydrogen. May as well drive a Ferrari for its green attributes.
 
Ferrari's are green because if everybody in the world that wanted a car could only buy a Ferrari - there would be about 1000x less cars in the world. Thats would mean that gasoline consumption would go down by probably 300x and likewise would carbon emissions from cars. Ferrari's are green!