Good write-up in Scientific American: Viral New Superconductivity Claims Leave Many Scientists Skeptical
Ranga Dias, a physicist at the University of Rochester, has recently made multiple claims about room-temperature superconductors. But retractions and allegations of scientific misconduct have marred the credibility of those findings.
All of this means that strong skepticism is the default for new reports of room-temperature superconductivity—especially ones that are as yet largely unvetted by peer review.
It is right to be sceptical, but IMO new teams should not be overly tarnished by the false claims made by earlier teams.
New teams should be judged on merit, with no assumptions, but with a requirement for definite proof.
Sometimes the new team is simply wrong rather than engaging in misconduct, so judge their work, but don't make assumptions about their motivation.
Very interested to see how this plays out. I'm keeping an open mind, but leaning towards being sceptical, but also assuming that the research team had good intentions.