SammichLover
Banned
What? The difference is only $4,000. It was as high as $6000 late last fall but never higher than that.
Are you comparing the SR+ price to the LR D? Because most of that difference is the much larger battery.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Is the dual motor option worth it?
- Thread starter evJOULE
- Start date
Are you comparing the SR+ price to the LR D? Because most of that difference is the much larger battery.
Both dual motor cars for sure won't have quite the range of the LR RWD, but we find the range certainly adequate for long trips, if we space SC stops properly.
But if you can afford it, DM is night and day in the snow and in traction-limited conditions compared to RWD.
Just don't stop at the AWD dual motor - spring for the performance version. It's a grin machine!!
jyalpert
Member
Yeah, for some reason if we wanted the dual motor, we would have had to get the long range as well, and it was $10,000 more. $4,000 is more reasonable, but still more than I'd be willing to spend.
The most important reason for me me to consider the LR AWD was getting up my 350 ft private entry gravel/crushed asphalt road from my lakeside cabin. It's very steep up/down from the main dirt road. Anything coming up with fwd will spin wheels (even with TC) and cause excessive wear on my private road. I got tired of parking my Chevy Volt in the guest parking on top by the main road and carrying all my things up and down last two seasons. I new that when I would back up my Volt backwards to bring it out from below I had no issues as all the weight is on the front traction wheels. Due to how narrow the little entry road is it's not always pleasant and a risk to fall in either ditch each side.
I took a calculated chance that my SR+ would work well. I have gone up a few times with my RWD SR+ and no wheel spin as slow and methodical as a caterpillar. Very happy. My cabin is seasonal so no winters. I love my SR+ RWD and Tesla TC. Also by parking next to my cabin power outlet I don't need to string extension cords up 300 ft to the main road parking. I'll put up a video of this sometime this summer.
I took a calculated chance that my SR+ would work well. I have gone up a few times with my RWD SR+ and no wheel spin as slow and methodical as a caterpillar. Very happy. My cabin is seasonal so no winters. I love my SR+ RWD and Tesla TC. Also by parking next to my cabin power outlet I don't need to string extension cords up 300 ft to the main road parking. I'll put up a video of this sometime this summer.
Taking delivery of my Performance in two days, so cannot first hand this issue yet, however this review helped me. If you are a spirited driver...
Tesla Model 3 Performance: Track Test
Tesla Model 3 Performance: Track Test
Scrith
Member
Revisiting this thread after more than a year with some new information! I originally posted that I didn't miss a dual motor Tesla shortly after receiving my very early Model 3 RWD w/ 18" wheels.
Anyway...I just traded in my wife's Model X (AWD) for an Model 3 LR AWD w/ 19" wheels, and I now switch off between the Model 3s throughout the week (to take advantage of free charging at work). Surprisingly, I'm seeing something unexpected, and my wife agrees: the RWD "feels" better than the AWD, steering-wise...I guess I'd describe it as feeling more nimble. The RWD just seems to snake around through traffic much more easily, whereas the AWD seems to lumber around a bit more, possibly due to additional weight in front? Whatever it is, we both seem to prefer driving the RWD. Maybe this is due to the larger wheels? Anyone have any feedback on these observations?
Anyway...I just traded in my wife's Model X (AWD) for an Model 3 LR AWD w/ 19" wheels, and I now switch off between the Model 3s throughout the week (to take advantage of free charging at work). Surprisingly, I'm seeing something unexpected, and my wife agrees: the RWD "feels" better than the AWD, steering-wise...I guess I'd describe it as feeling more nimble. The RWD just seems to snake around through traffic much more easily, whereas the AWD seems to lumber around a bit more, possibly due to additional weight in front? Whatever it is, we both seem to prefer driving the RWD. Maybe this is due to the larger wheels? Anyone have any feedback on these observations?
Last edited:
Totally different chassis with vastly different weights and polar inertia (resistance to rotation). The Model X is based on previous and older model S chassis and is significantly more ponderous, even though it was regarded as a competent handler relative to and despite its considerable mass. The M3, even in its AWD config, feels way lighter on its feet than its 4k lbs would ever suggest (a design target by all accounts), and the RWD M3 is even more so, witth great turn in and transient response even with stock wheels/tires, with less mass in the front not having a front motor. Or as Colin Chapman famously put it, when you want the best possible handling, do your best design, and then add lightness.
Last edited:
From what I’ve read, I think most who have driven both back to back will agree the RWD handles better and is more fun in that way. the AWD trades nimbleness for brute force acceleration and traction during that acceleration.
RWD is always the best for driving experience. It's not uncommon to take a AWD Lamborghini and make it RWD as an upgrade.
But there are a lot of advantages to AWD too. Like launch times. Just depends on what is your priority.
Yep. But you can mitigate that with three or four interventions - some are cheap some are not.
We have two Model 3 Performance, One stock with just lighter aftermarket wheels and the other extensively tuned up. I put the Sports coilover kit on mine from MPP, lowered the car a little over an inch, put on wider front wheels and will soon have wider front tires, and with the lowering got to about -1 degree camber on the front. The differences in turn in and responsiveness from all of those changes are pretty significant. The modified car does not feel sluggish on turn in at all and is extremely snappy in its transient response. Oh one other thing, if you don't have them already get the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Excellent transient response and pretty good ultimate limits for a Street Tire. And all of these changes have not had a punitive effect on the ride. For sure my car rides more firmly but it's still quite comfortable
Scott lives in Wisconsin, you live in florida.
Nope - I actually don't think that your response was criticism but rather is tangential and has absolutely nothing to do with the subject at hand which is how much the all-wheel drive version suffers in terms of handling responsiveness compared to the rear wheel drive version. Please explain to me what your irrelevant post has to do with that question?The irrelevant response about the Porsche (as a preferred alternative to the Tesla!) was offered after a prior irrelevant response about where the two of us lived so I just have to wonder can you stay on topic?
Last edited:
Similar threads
