I wonder if 285/30/22 will rub when I install lowering springs
Yes, it will. Not all the time, but it will.
I ran 285/30/22 Continentals on my S with 22x10.5 et37 Vossen VFS1's, and they rub the fender liner and rear bumper when going over bumps. It's also quite close to the strut tower, might rub there if super low as well.
Likely an efficiency compromise. Wider tires result in considerable increases to wh/mi numbers.
II think it came down to efficiency, fitment, and Load rating.
A 265 meets the traction needs of the car, and offers lower rolling resistance just due to a smaller contact patch. Porsche runs 205 on the 911 Turbo, but they don't have to worry as much about their general clientele complaining about 'efficiency.'
Therefore, 265 is enough traction to launch the car without customers incessantly complaining that they didn't get exactly 400 miles from a charge. 265/35 is also a bit more available as a tire size, I think.
From a fitment standpoint, a 285 width tire fits quite close to the strut tower, so they'd need to change the offset of the rear wheels to account for that, thus pushing the tire closer to flush than they seem to like.
On load rating, the the 265/35 is a 101Y (1820 lbs), the 285/30 is a 100Y (1750 lbs).
I got a chance to buy some aftermarket wheels from an f10 BMW m5 but do you guys think the rears will fit? For rears, I would to use at least a 285/295 tire.
Staggered Setup:
- 21x10 Front et 28
- 21x11.5 Rear et 32
I'm fairly certain the largest OEM wheel that was offered on the F10 was a 20", no? For example, the Style 612s fit the measurements you listed, and they're on the X5M, not the M5.
Either way, no, I don't think that'll fit in the back. With a +32mm offset and a 11.5" wheel, I think your wheel is going to stick out past the fender AND rub the shock tower at the same time lol.
Additionally, the hub bore of the F10 M5 is 72.6mm vs the S's 64.1mm, so you'd need hub rings.