You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what US regulatory bodies have approved of the frankenchad plug? NEC? SAE? DOE?
So what US regulatory bodies have approved of the frankenchad plug? NEC? SAE? DOE?
Once again, this is a circular reference to this post by Doug:Chademo adapter will be available in Japan for the Model S so probably elsewhere as well.
Tesla Model S To Have CHAdeMO Quick-Charge Adaptor In Japan
So I managed to get some confirmation on this from Tesla. For now, a CHAdeMo adapter is only confirmed for Japan. No word yet on pricing.
Physically the adapter will be as we anticipated. A box with a CHAdeMO inlet and a cable that connects to the Model S. You'd stow this adapter cable in your trunk like you would the UMC.
So I managed to get some confirmation on this from Tesla. For now, a CHAdeMo adapter is only confirmed for Japan. No word yet on pricing.
Physically the adapter will be as we anticipated. A box with a CHAdeMO inlet and a cable that connects to the Model S. You'd stow this adapter cable in your trunk like you would the UMC.
Tesla is working on an adapter for CHAdeMO charging but does not yet have an official timeline on when it will be available.
That hints at US availability rather than just Japanese availability. If they are going to make one for Japan anyways, I don't see any reason to not sell it in the US also. If they can get around the adapter ban in Europe, they can also sell in Europe.Just received an email from Tesla:
Tesla is working on an adapter for CHAdeMO charging but does not yet have an official timeline on when it will be available.
I don't think anyone expected it to be really huge in general (obviously it must be portable in the first place to be practical), just significantly larger than what the J1772 DC version would be (I expect that to be soda can sized like the standard J1772 adapter). It'll probably be similar to the UMC in size, at worse it'll be like an AVCON adapter (with the box designed to be on the ground and the cable plugged vertically into it). The cabling will also need to be fairly bulky to handle 50kW DC.^ you mean it isn't the size of an ENIAC like some here were adamant it would need to be?![]()
![]()
Not just a hint, my question was to [email protected] and it was specific to the US.That hints at US availability rather than just Japanese availability. If they are going to make one for Japan anyways, I don't see any reason to not sell it in the US also. If they can get around the adapter ban in Europe, they can also sell in Europe.
I don't think anyone expected it to be really huge in general (obviously it must be portable in the first place to be practical), just significantly larger than what the J1772 DC version would be (I expect that to be soda can sized like the standard J1772 adapter). It'll probably be similar to the UMC in size, at worse it'll be like an AVCON adapter (with the box designed to be on the ground and the cable plugged vertically into it). The cabling will also need to be fairly bulky to handle 50kW DC.
It's somewhat surprising Washington and Oregon is faster than California in the race for DC chargers, although now knowing the California requirement to support SAE at minimum, California may have been waiting for SAE DC to be finalized before going head on into DC chargers (rather than having to retrofit later).Here's another vote for wanting a CHAdeMO adapter. Washington and Oregon recently put in nearly 50 high current DC CHAdeMO chargers along all the major roadways as part of the West Coast Electric Highway project. In a sense, we already have a complete Supercharger network installed up here that Model S owners can't use until Tesla puts out an adapter.