You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One thing I agree with Trump - CNN is garbage (for different reasons, obviously).
You mean owners.You really believe it's CNN acting of their own accord? Not that they're acting for their "donors?"
You mean owners.
Pelosi didn’t mention that Bush had Congress’ support. Little different situation here.
She also stated the evidence didn’t support the nuclear weapons theory. But to definitively say there are none and to impeach, would be difficult to prove.
You wouldn’t need to show that no weapons exist, just that the administration didn’t actually believe they did exist. If I claim to be 100% sure of the next lottery numbers when I don’t actually have that foresight, that’s still a lie if I happened to guess them correctly.
Lying to go to war is not good and it should be an impeachable offense, but Bush was not the first to do it and get away with it. Democrats have been guilty of it too. So in the divided atmosphere of the country in 2006, and even more divided now, the crimes need to be unprecedented and very easy to prove to impeach the president.
Even at that McConnell has made it clear he is not really going to hold a trial. He will just have opening statements and then a vote. He is desperate to have this over before the primaries, but if he's not going to hold a real trial, Pelosi can always decide to keep investigating and drag things out into the primaries.
We will also hear tomorrow whether SCOTUS will take up three appeals cases about Trump and obstruction of Congress. If they AWOP them, SCOTUS is saying there are no merits to the case and the lower court ruling stands. In each case the lower court ruling is against Trump. That will hand over a bunch of financial documents to Congress and might give Pelosi an excuse to slow roll impeachment until the records have been reviewed.
OT : Warren is just Obama 2.0 2.0. Do not trust.
Warren has been busy pivoting on issue after issue. I wonder whether you reconsider how trustworthy Warren is.I really disagree here, Obama was rather naive in approaching Republicans - he tried to work with them and they obstructed him in unprecedented ways at every single step. The DOJ should have prosecuted Wall Street for 2008 - instead Obama administration let them go. The same goes for the torture and the widespread graft in and around Iraq.
Warren has none of that kind of naivete, and Wall Street knows it:
Warren has been busy pivoting on issue after issue. I wonder whether you reconsider how trustworthy Warren is.
Deepa Shivaram on Twitter
Warren starting to emphasize *choice* in the Medicare transition process -- this is new for her: "We're going to push through... full health care coverage at no cost for everyone else who wants it, you can buy it for a modest amount. You don't have to, but it's your choice."
Warren has been busy pivoting on issue after issue. I wonder whether you reconsider how trustworthy Warren is.
There is no chance she'd get a six percent wealth tax so I wouldn't worry about that.Her six percent wealth tax on billionaires would destroy both Tesla and SpaceX. I mean obliterate. Imagine Musk selling billions of TSLA every year just to pay the tax. It would be game over for Tesla.