You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Key words. Safety Technologies.This passage from NHTSA applies to almost everything said in this thread.
NHTSA, where are you?
I've now used it very successfully three times. You have to remember that when viewing the car's movements from a distance it looks like it may be hitting another vehicle or obstacle when usually it has adequate clearance.
Yet I’ve used it safely many times in two days.This is just another way of saying this feature cannot be made safe.
I think my anecdote does matter, as do all the other successful SS videos.You understand that your anecdote doesn't matter.
You also understand that the dozens and dozens of videos of it being used in unsafe ways, contrary to even Tesla's instructions, are evidence of predictable abuse.
I think my anecdote does matter, as do all the other successful SS videos.
You said it can’t be used safely, which, in fact, it can. Are there instances of it not working, sure.
Yet I’ve used it safely many times in two days.
You said it can’t be used safely, which, in fact, it can.
Got it. So not working safely = never having any issues. Sure, ban everything.
so then no cars should be sold, as there are millions of data points and videos of people using them unsafely.
get over it, its happening.
Not arguing disingenuously at all, and I don’t appreciate the inference that I am.You're arguing disingenuously, and I don't appreciate it.
NHTSA's position has nothing to do with cases where it is used safely. NHTSA is concerned with cases where it is not used safely. It is inarguable that there are many many people using it unsafely, because there are dozens and dozens of YouTube videos documenting the abuse, all within a few days of SS release. The abuse is clearly defined -- these people used it contrary to Tesla's direct instructions.
NHTSA's position: "while automated safety technologies may facilitate increased safety, manufacturers should ensure that over the lifespan of the vehicle such technologies themselves do not create unreasonable risks to safety due to predictable abuse or impractical recalibration requirements. The Agency agrees. Unreasonable risks due to predictable abuse or impractical recalibration requirements may constitute safety-related defects."
This is a pointless strawman argument. NHTSA's predictable abuse clause is applied to automated safety technologies. No one doubts that cars in general can be used unsafely, and no one (including NHTSA) takes the position that cars should be banned.
It's not up to you, or to me. NHTSA will eventually rule on this.
You said it can’t be made safe
To prove that it can be used with an acceptable level of safety you would have to test it in tens of thousands of different parking lots while following Tesla's instructions. That's irrelevant though if enough people are using it unsafely. I'm not saying it's unsafe, so far it has been very entertaining (which is real value!), I'm just saying that determining statistically whether or not it's safe is impractical for an individual user.Not arguing disingenuously at all, and I don’t appreciate the inference that I am.
You said it can’t be made safe and I can provide video evidence that it can. Does it mean that it’s safe 100% of the time, no, but neither is anything.
Well I used to be a police officer so......Ok thanks for clarifying, makes sense. I’ll still disagree that they need to consider predictable use. We will agree to disagree on generally safe - different impressions. Agree with you as people are using it in stupid situations (people/traffic) bit I’m good with it is now as I know how/when/where to use it. All I’m saying.Okay, fair point, if a bit lawyer-like. What I intended to say -- and what you know I intended to say! -- is that it cannot be made generally safe.
It cannot be made generally safe because of its enormous potential for predictable abuse.
NHTSA says that if the technology creates unreasonable risks to safety due to predictable abuse, then the technology may constitute a safety-related defect.
People are using SS to drive their cars through complex parking lots full of pedestrians, in ways that they admit -- literally admit on camera -- are outside their line of sight. This is predictable abuse. Literally everyone predicted that SS would be immediately used in unintended ways.
I don't think there's going to be much patience or tolerance for us fanboys playing with our toys, at the expense of other's safety or other drivers convenience
Yeah no problem. Appreciate the discussion and your opinion. Just trying to present my opinion as well. Cheers.Thank you. I really appreciate your honesty and openness to hearing others' opinions. It seems really rare these days, especially around Tesla products.
Really not impressed so far and looks like it's going to be even less useful that regular Summon.
From my experience, the first fail is clearly the pedestrians.... The car is confused when seeing them and stops until they clear, which they don't.... As for the 2nd fail, not sure why it tanked other than sensing the approaching car.... but once the car backed away, it should have resumed.....
I had this occur under the TEAP release.... but not since the full release...
Its all beta.
If I'm not mistaken...you accepted the "beta" version before you used it.
No?