You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or is it a display mounted where the cover was missing from the steering column on the black car?
What's with the headlights? Maybe small run but functional? I know this is just a release candidate but they look foggy and yellow, not clear and sharp like the prototypes.
I thought the same thing. The headlights were so striking and mean looking on the Model 3 alphas. These can't be the actual headlights. They don't look like they're finished.What's with the headlights? Maybe small run but functional? I know this is just a release candidate but they look foggy and yellow, not clear and sharp like the prototypes.
That spoiler really is huge and ridiculous-looking. I'm starting to think it's not just the reflection or color either. It seems tacked-on and the edges don't seamlessly flow into the body like on the X.Spy shots of the production candidate spotted in Los Altos Hills recently:
http://jalopnik.com/this-is-the-ful...ource=jalopnik_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
Remember that Cd is shape dependent and independent of frontal area. So while the Cd on the X may be equal to that on the S, the overall aero drag on the X is higher due to the increased height/frontal area.That's why the X has the same Cd as the S even though it's taller.
After seeing this angle I think it might be the same as the alpha. Couldn't find this exact angle from the silver one last year. Maybe it's just the darker colors that cause the bigger spoiler effect from a certain angle.I think the under side of the spoiler where it "connects" to the trunk has a sharper fold, which makes the spoiler look bigger.
I understand. I'm saying if the X had the same rear shape as the S, it would have a higher Cd. But if the S had the same rear shape as the X, it would have a lower Cd.Remember that Cd is shape dependent and independent of frontal area. So while the Cd on the X may be equal to that on the S, the overall aero drag on the X is higher due to the increased height/frontal area.
I think what's jarring is the separation of taillight from the spoiler. There's no way to blend the taillight in a little better? Both the S and the X do a much better job of that. This would reduce turbulence as well. Really makes the spoiler look out of place. It looks unfinished.After seeing this angle I think it might be the same as the alpha. Couldn't find this exact angle from silver one last year. Maybe it's just the darker colors that causes the bigger spoiler effect from a certain angle.
Is that the charge port? Its totally dark on the other side. No red reflector or anything.After seeing this angle I think it might be the same as the alpha. Couldn't find this exact angle from the silver one last year. Maybe it's just the darker colors that cause the bigger spoiler effect from a certain angle.
This also shows the new "break" on the side of the tail light, which I don't believe would allow the trunk to open there.
I absolutely love the larger spoiler. Its really really nice.After seeing this angle I think it might be the same as the alpha. Couldn't find this exact angle from the silver one last year. Maybe it's just the darker colors that cause the bigger spoiler effect from a certain angle.
This also shows the new "break" on the side of the tail light, which I don't believe would allow the trunk to open there.
Remember the Alpha didn't have a charge port on the rear lights. Looks like the new model does. "Possibly on both sides".I think what's jarring is the separation of taillight from the spoiler. There's no way to blend the taillight in a little better? Both the S and the X do a much better job of that. This would reduce turbulence as well. Really makes the spoiler look out of place. It looks unfinished.
View attachment 221555
Here is the X:
View attachment 221556
See how it blends nicely into the taillight?
Also I don't really like this. What's up with that?
View attachment 221557
Model S and X continue a smooth transition between the body panel and trunk.
View attachment 221558
View attachment 221561
View attachment 221559
The 3 trunk panel just kinda sinks in, killing the seamless flowing continuity of it all.
View attachment 221562
The fact that Tesla intentionally adds a lip makes it stand out even more, and not in a good way.
Honestly, the more I look at the subtle details of Model 3's design, the more it looks like they just smushed an S and X together, then intentionally made it worse. There are so many unfinished design cues on Model 3 that S/X nail down perfectly. It makes no sense, and you wouldn't expect Tesla to get worse at designing cars over time. And here we all thought Elon would never, and I mean never, intentionally cripple Model 3 because his only interest was making the best car possible at the best price. It really does look like they went the polar opposite direction by just making 3 a worse S/X. You don't see that with other car manufacturers. The designs might be better or worse, but they generally have their own identity. The cheaper cars are not just the same thing as their bigger brothers but without the refined details.
I don't see how that has anything to do with the lazy spoiler design? Both S and X have charging ports and do a great job at not only integrating the spoiler gracefully, but arguably making it look better. Model 3 does neither.Remember the Alpha didn't have a charge port on the rear lights. Looks like the new model does. "Possibly on both sides".
I wasn't commenting on the spoiler design. I was commenting on the rear light design compared to the Alpha.I don't see how that has anything to do with the lazy spoiler design? Both S and X have charging ports and do a great job at not only integrating the spoiler gracefully, but arguably making it look better. Model 3 does neither.
Initially I felt the same way as you but then I remembered how much better the ex looks in person then it doesn't pictures hopefully will be the same case hereThat spoiler really is huge and ridiculous-looking. I'm starting to think it's not just the reflection or color either. It seems tacked-on and the edges don't seamlessly flow into the body like on the X.
Front also looks a little weird. The hard creases on the alpha were one thing, but at least it was consistent. There was an aggressive design intent and they stuck with it. Now Tesla went and compromised that aggression by blending the sides, while keeping the front crisp, and it seems muddled and inconsistent. I think I prefer the prototype.
And then there's the interior... was Elon's idea of "spaceship controls" just putting silly red LEDs in the dash that presumably slide back and forth like a robot talking?
The headlights are wayyyyy different and look awful, frankly. I sure hope those are just for testing because we lost all those beautiful lines in favor of blocky chunks.
And the overall shape just seems a little too puffy and fat and bulbous. Part of it has to do with the small hood that doesn't extend far enough beyond the wheels. There's also not enough horizontal-ness on the trunk like the S. It looks like the X. It's amazing; it doesn't take much to make the car look like a CUV vs sedan, but a little elongation OR smoother transition to horizontal (and then slope back up into the spoiler) would make Model 3 look so much sleeker and less like a van. But, you lose out on aerodynamics by doing that. That's why the X has the same Cd as the S even though it's taller.
I see changes, however they have already been mentioned.General opinion is that there has been no changes to the cars. Much of what people think they are seeing seems to be an effect of the colour. Yes, charge port. Speculation that perhaps the other side will have a different charging plug (but I doubt it).