So why cover it during charging? What are they trying to hide? The cars driving around they don't attempt to cover anything. It's more than just a generic cover also, what with zipper access for the door and charge port. Thoughts?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a simple explanation... they don't want people seeing the range yet.So why cover it during charging? What are they trying to hide? The cars driving around they don't attempt to cover anything. It's more than just a generic cover also, what with zipper access for the door and charge port. Thoughts?
The conspiracy theorist in me says "if that's true, they would just cover the screen - they must be hiding something amazing that we haven't seen yet!"I have a simple explanation... they don't want people seeing the range yet.
We'd need more Ohio spy shots to confirm. I think the California ones are actually RCs but the Ohio ones are not release candidates, but the final design (or at least as close to final as possible before you waste money on crash testing).The conspiracy theorist in me says "if that's true, they would just cover the screen - they must be hiding something amazing that we haven't seen yet!"
I have a simple explanation... they don't want people seeing the range yet.
I did see a picture a week or two ago where someone caught a Model 3 charging in a garage. It had the dash and screen covered but not the exterior. I can't find it now, though...The conspiracy theorist in me says "if that's true, they would just cover the screen - they must be hiding something amazing that we haven't seen yet!"
Shouldn't the release candidates and final design essentially be the same? Other than fit and finish and maybe less hand-built, I would think the design would be the same.We'd need more Ohio spy shots to confirm. I think the California ones are actually RCs but the Ohio ones are not release candidates, but the final design (or at least as close to final as possible before you waste money on crash testing).
Essentially, yes.Shouldn't the release candidates and final design essentially be the same? Other than fit and finish and maybe less hand-built, I would think the design would be the same.
What are the differences? Other than wheels, I think they have all been the same. Okay, the very first black one had non-production intent headlights and there was the supposed C-pillar sensor (which I'm convinced was just a sticker), but other than that I'm not aware of any differences.Essentially, yes.
Release Candidates <-- plural
There are slight differences in some of the RCs we've been seeing.
We have seen different wheels, brakes, panel fit changes etc etc. Each one is slightly different.What are the differences? Other than wheels, I think they have all been the same. Okay, the very first black one had non-production intent headlights and there was the supposed C-pillar sensor (which I'm convinced was just a sticker), but other than that I'm not aware of any differences.
What are the differences? Other than wheels, I think they have all been the same. Okay, the very first black one had non-production intent headlights and there was the supposed C-pillar sensor (which I'm convinced was just a sticker), but other than that I'm not aware of any differences.
What has been different with the brakes? Panel fit is not a design change, that is just bad assemblyWe have seen different wheels, brakes, panel fit changes etc etc. Each one is slightly different.
Nothing looks different to me with those headlights. The black one had cloudy looking, off-white, almost yellowish lenses that look like they were rapid prototyped. These look like the production ones to me.The two blue ones had different headlights as well
It'd be strange to have tape on both sides of the vehicle in the same spot and one and have one look like it's got a camera behind it:
That latest blue one though... almost NSFW.
What are the differences? Other than wheels, I think they have all been the same. Okay, the very first black one had non-production intent headlights and there was the supposed C-pillar sensor (which I'm convinced was just a sticker), but other than that I'm not aware of any differences.
No no no. They're hiding the hatchback and solar roof!Good point....unless the SW currently only activates the HUD while charging . I couldn't help myself.
"They" are not trying to "hide" anything. The cover is there for cosmetic purposes only: IMAGINE the wear and tear on the paint, the windows, the door handles etc. if the charging was done without that cover. *phew* Man what a messSo why cover it during charging? What are they trying to hide?
Nothing looks different to me with those headlights.
I stand by my belief that is still not a senor/camera and just a sticker. Lighting and camera effects can trick the eye into what it wants to see. I see a sticker Besides, I find it highly suspect since we have seen no other car have these. Having it on just one doesn't make sense.
The Model S has a AP2 camera in that spot. I would assume that's what it is on the Model 3.It'd be strange to have tape on both sides of the vehicle in the same spot and one and have one look like it's got a camera behind it:
On the Model S, the dash doesn't display anything if you aren't next to the car with the fob. The 3 likely behaves the same way. Thus, the range wouldn't be visible.I have a simple explanation... they don't want people seeing the range yet.