For argument's sake let's say that I had used #3 cable instead and I was now seeing 234 W while charging instead of 237. Am I correct that if the car needs to charge the same amount in both examples, and if I'm charging at the same amperage, it is going to need to charge longer when it is only receiving the 234 W than when it is receiving 237, and since I am paying for the 240 I am drawing at the source in both cases, longer is, of course, more expensive?
Assuming all of the above is correct (which may be a big assumption, given my very limited understanding of this stuff) am I also correct that the fact that I generally charge at 56 amps will minimize but not eliminate the cost benefit I am seeing from lower voltage drop due to having installed better wire? Or does the lower amperage not factor in at all because the total amount of juice that has to get into the battery remains the same, and the speed at which it happens is irrelevant with respect to the loss?