You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha... oh, I see it now.Jello's comment was satire.
I hope the Triple has two charge ports. I have two 80 AMP HPWC at home, and on the road that would shorten charge times for the larger battery pack..Any rumours on what size the OBC will be? Something like the previously available 72 amp or dual 40’s. Big battery like that it might be nice to have some reasonably quick AC charging available.
Both my current Model S's (2014 & 2016) have old school dual 40's...I know dual 40's are nice to have! View attachment 484780
How is it any different from the majority of pickups sold today? Four doors and a short box. Walk onto any dealership and try to find a 4 door long box. You will load drywall just like everone else does. With the tailgate down the bed will be 8 feet long and it will fully support the drywall
That problem was solved by slanting the sides so high that a 5th wheel cannot be used anyway.All this talk about 5th wheels has me wondering about the battery location/size. Are we assuming the battery will reside between the wheel wells like our cars? I assumed the battery would extend at least partially thru the bed to get the extended range thing. Could complicate subbed reenforcement to support the 5th wheel ball.
Is there any concern with the truck being super hot since the body is stainless steel? I would imagine that you wouldn't want to touch it after it's been baking under the sun for a few hours.
If you must absolutely tow a 5th wheel with your CyberTruck, just get a tow dolly:
I hope they add some mirrors... big mirrors. Drives me nuts when they put small car mirrors on a truck.
There has to be a backup, a camera system isn't always going to work perfectly. It's going to get covered in slush and snow.
It's pretty funny how they are making assumptions about the performance of a vehicle that won't be out for 2 years and with very little information on the design. Of course the vehicle will have to be designed to absorb impact forces. Tesla is not going to release a vehicle to the public that is a death trap in an accident.German authorities state that the Cybertruck’s structure is too rigid and therefore does not provide occupants with the mandatory safety. Furthermore, the rigid body panels are a nightmare when it comes to pedestrian protection.
Tesla Cybertruck Too Unsafe To Be Sold In Europe, German Authorities Say | Carscoops
German authorities state that the Cybertruck’s structure is too rigid and therefore does not provide occupants with the mandatory safety. Furthermore, the rigid body panels are a nightmare when it comes to pedestrian protection.
Tesla Cybertruck Too Unsafe To Be Sold In Europe, German Authorities Say | Carscoops
Yes, that was something I was wondering about as well. Obviously you need crumple zones in the front of the car. However the article is a bit arrogant in that they don't seem to allow for any possibility of Tesla figuring this out in 2 years. Tesla is the company that crows about how safe their cars are. You think they wouldn't realize the need for crumple zones?? Obviously the front will be designed with more than simple steel plates to allow for crash absorption.
BTW, IF the Cybertruck has a falcon wing moment (ie. the reason the Model X was delayed was design of the falcon wings - they had to go to plan B), it will be designing the crumple zone. It isn't intuitively obvious (at least to my poor brain) how to make that truck safe for occupants in a cost effective manner. I believe Elon/Tesla are completely up to the challenge, but it might indeed be challenging.
Seems to me one solution could be to have the frunk lid and front fender panels slide towards the rear (over the windshield and doors) on frontal impact instead of crumbling in place. The frunk lid is already detached so it likely isn’t structural. And the fender panels could be designed to break away from any sub-structure in place, even if part of the exoskeleton.Yes, that was something I was wondering about as well. Obviously you need crumple zones in the front of the car. However the article is a bit arrogant in that they don't seem to allow for any possibility of Tesla figuring this out in 2 years. Tesla is the company that crows about how safe their cars are. You think they wouldn't realize the need for crumple zones?? Obviously the front will be designed with more than simple steel plates to allow for crash absorption.
I had the same thought. Tesla could score all the front panels in such a way as they they fold up in a wreck. I'm sure there are ways to crack this nut.Could it be as simple as scoring the back of the SS but not folding it to make a crumple zone? (Since they said they had to score it for the folds they are making.)