It did not change my ride height one little bit and it was something I was keenly aware of when I did my first set of arms ![Smile :) :)]()
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The adjustable links have been completed. They will come with the updated bushings already installed. The cost will be 800.00 plus a 200.00 core for your old links. I am attempting to attach a photo.
Depending on interest, BBC Speed And Machine will make whatever we need.
Do note that the ones I did were 0.210" longer than the stock OEM parts. This was just about the limit of what I could do before I ran out of adjustment on the toe links. I did try some 0.250" longer parts but found I could not get toe in on one side of the car. We loosened the sub frame bushings and straightened the sub-frame with respect to the car which allowed me to get just a little tow in on both rear wheels but I found the car was not stable enough for my liking.
I think you will find that anything longer than the links from OpenEVSE may cause you a toe problem.
Are these links (and the ones on openevse) designed for coils, air suspension, or both?
do you suppose that compliance or rubber bushing wear in the short integral-link below the toe-link at the leading edge of the rear suspension could cause the extreme inner shoulder wear that some have seen
I have a 60 and don't do much crazy accelerating, but I'm facing complete replacement of the initial 19" Goodyears with fewer than 15,000 miles, due to the same inside treadwear problem documented on this thread. I haven't seen any discussion on this thread about the other cause of excessive rear tire wear in normally driven Teslas: regenerative braking. I'm diligent about letting regen handle almost all of my needed deceleration, because it saves electricity and has allowed me to keep lifetime average efficiency below 290 Wh/mile. But, unfortunately, that puts all of those forces on the rear tires alone. Wouldn't one of the biggest advantages of the dual motor configuration be that it more evenly distributes regenerative braking forces across all four tires?
I have a 60 and don't do much crazy accelerating, but I'm facing complete replacement of the initial 19" Goodyears with fewer than 15,000 miles, due to the same inside treadwear problem documented on this thread. I haven't seen any discussion on this thread about the other cause of excessive rear tire wear in normally driven Teslas: regenerative braking.
Ok artsci, spill the beans. Those are fantastic looking rims and I am in the market for some for the PD. Whose are they?????
Thanks,
Bill
Hey Rick, I ran the Bridgestone Pole Potenza RE970AS all season tires on my stock 19" wheels for two winters. After 10000 miles they won't pass inspection. I run the Conti Extreme summers in my 21" wheels and after 10000 miles of summer driving still have about half tread left. Also, I experienced about 20% mileage loss from the Bridgestones compared to others on the same long drive, same speed and conditions (convoy). Tesla engineers said they tested these Bridgestones among all others they considered and found that they had the worst rolling resistance of all they tested. They said a 20% mileage loss should be normal with these tires. I'm now running Michelin MXM4 Primacy all seasons in my new TST Sportline dark grey turbine 19" wheels and love them so far.