No. France had riots because the French government prevented the parliament from voting the pension law even though it is opposed by more than 95% of working-age people. The prime minister admitted they couldn't get l'Assemblée Nationale to approve the text. The government forced both chambers to accept the text as is (49.3) or to make the government resign (which they didn't, as it would give Macron a good chance to dissolve the parliament).
Before 49.3, people were just going on strike and peacefully demonstrating. The government force it through, and that's when people got pissed. Police got extremely repressive and the ministry of Interior lies shamelessly about the violence. 53% say they won't consider joining the demonstration because of police violence (source).
The crisis isn't about the social conflict, but how authoritarian the regime has become.
I was inaccurate about the root cause of the riots, but my overarching point is still there.
My point was about people in democracies around the world distrusting their governments. In some cases it's justified, in others it may not be. The riots in France are more on the justified end of the scale (due to actual actions the government took), but it stems from people not being happy with what they believe the government is doing.
In other places people have taken action against the government based more on lies they were told, or vast exaggerations of the truth, but it all comes back to the government and the people having an adversarial relationship and this has been on the rise the last 40 years.