This is from paragraph 87 with my emphasis added:
The Plaintiffs really expect us to believe there are thousands of AP2.0 owners who will join this class when
91% of people who own a Tesla would by another one?
It will be interesting to watch.
In retrospect, because of the delay, I wouldn't have ordered FSD when I ordered my car.
I had the expectation that EAP would be further along when I received the vehicle (I ordered when it had the Dec. 2016 language). In the end, this EAP delay pushed me away from a purchase of the vehicle and to a lease for several reasons:
- I worry, now, that it will be announce that my AP2 vehicle does not, in fact, have the necessary HW for FSD (e.g. it will be found LIDAR just can't be avoided) or that the roll-out will have multi-year delays (e.g. 2020 for FSD, as many manufacturers are projecting),
- I worry that these ongoing over-promise/under-deliver issues will impact Tesla so severely with the M3 launch that they will need to reorganize and may end up dumping warranty obligations (i.e. ch11), or
- I wonder if better SD technology may be developed by a competitor with a reasonable EV/HEV vehicle on a faster timeline (e.g. Audi - not that they haven't had their own honesty issues).
I also looked into other insurance (e.g. buying put options to cover the est. residual after three years given a Ch 11 event). Because I ended up deciding to lease, the lack of EAP and FSD eats at me a bit more as I perceive that I'm paying for the depreciation of an asset I was never delivered (granted, maybe to actually get EAP to market in December, the car may have cost more up-front, so this discount may be built in?).
Despite all of this, I would order today if I didn't already have the vehicle and I had the foreknowledge of this experience... again, I just wouldn't have purchased the FSD option and I probably would have planned on leasing (I may have waited on EAP or considered a CPO with AP1, too).
All of this is to say, I don't think it's impossible for people to feel like they are "owed" a refund (or reduction in lease-price) for a product not delivered and, yet, be satisfied with the vehicle as a whole. NOT the whole car, just the undelivered/under-delivered parts of the vehicle.
I don't know how many others feel like I do, so I make no claims regarding the "thousands" assertion. Just that I can imagine that there may be a big overlap in the Venn Diagram of (Would buy again ( dissatisfied with EAP/FSD timeline ) Want partial/full refund ).
EDIT: I suppose it could be argued that I had the chance to forego taking delivery by forfeiting my deposit. Maybe it would be a reasonable argument by Tesla to say that that, the deposit amount, is their maximum liability in the lawsuit?