MrAustraliaTax
Member
Public Service Announcement: To avoid being rear-ended by Teslas in the future, all firetrucks must now park underneath overpasses.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is it so challenging and elusive to design AEB to avoid large stationary objects?
I suspect they don’t either.It's bizarre, you would think that would be the easiest and first thing they could do. Pretty sure Volvos do it.
It's bizarre, you would think that would be the easiest and first thing they could do. Pretty sure Volvos do it.
Thank you. That is why I said I suspect even Volvo’s or any cars can detect stationary objects without getting a lot of false alarms which is a bigger problem.Radar is great at detecting the speed of objects it sees, but it gets a lot of 'zero' reports from everything around the road that isn't moving, so it pretty much has to ignore things it only ever detects as stationary or you'd be getting the brakes slammed on all the time.
Lidar and machine vision systems are much better suited to that sort of work...
It’s not a back road. It’s a weird half-freeway, half high capacity arterial with stoplights. More and more of the lights have been converted to full interchanges. Three lanes each direction, fully separated. The speed limit is 55 on that section I believe, but it’s not unusual for cars to drive 70+ on it.I suspect they don’t either.
Also how can anyone drive AP at 60mph on a back road?
Not all of them.It's bizarre, you would think that would be the easiest and first thing they could do. Pretty sure Volvos do it.
Public Service Announcement: To avoid being rear-ended by Teslas in the future, all firetrucks must now park underneath overpasses.
Part of the problem is that Tesla charges $5k for essentially lane assist which leads people to believe it can do more than it does. I mean who would pay that much for lane assist when it's becoming a standard feature on other cars, right? It must be able to do more than that...AP2 release notes were for local roads. How many local roads don't have red lights?
Tesla's inconsistent messaging creates ambiguity.
Bottom line is people shouldn't use AP unless they are paying attention. End of story.
Part of the problem is that Tesla charges $5k for essentially lane assist which leads people to believe it can do more than it does. I mean who would pay that much for lane assist when it's becoming a standard feature on other cars, right? It must be able to do more than that...
The traffic light makes no difference in this instance. If TACC or AP was in use, it would have slowed and stopped behind the fire truck.
I believe it is unlikely that the driver of the Tesla was using TACC or AP, otherwise the Tesla would have sensed the stationary fire truck and stopped appropriately.
At 30 mph...The first one tested looks stationary to me.