I actually went from 95% to 22% in 131 miles (it was 90F, sunny outside) with cruise control at 78mph on a somewhat flat highway, with one stop near the end of that leg of the trip for a 1h picnic. Car was parked in the sun and cabin overheat protection came on while we were eating outside, but yeah 73% used for 131 miles would yield roughly 180 miles of range from 100% to zero in the case of this trip. I drove normally, accelerated normally etc.
And I fully understand the argument that that type of range covers 95% of most people's driving (less than that for us who experience Canadian winters), but the problem is what do you do for the 5-10% or more of the instances where it doesn't cut it? Rent a car? That's a huge hassle in and of itself, never mind the fact that your $75k USD ($100k CAD with taxes in Canada) car is basically useless? It's a very hard problem to solve, even Tesla hasn't solved it. Just throwing in more battery capacity means higher cost and more weight.
Also, IMO, all EVs should have a city and highway range rating just like ICE cars have city/highway mileage ratings. Actually, the difference between city/highway range is even greater for EVs than the difference in mileage for ICE cars. I might consider an EV as a main car when there is an 8 stall reliable fast charger in every gas station in the country, until then, it does not compute.