I think AEdennis means "The single/dual charger setup has been on the S.
Correct. Getting late in Southern California. I meant the S. Typed the X.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think AEdennis means "The single/dual charger setup has been on the S.
I was initially happy to be getting the new nose, until I asked about the "High Amperage Charger Upgrade" on the configuration page only going to 16.5 kW.
It seems that the 22 kW dual chargers I ordered are not able to be fitted to The Model S with the new nose, and you are limited to 11 or 16.5 kW. At 220 Wh/km, this is a 75 km/h rather than 100 km/h charge rate. This has been a surprise to everybody, including Tesla staff in Australia.
Limiting to 16.5 kW does not make sense to me as 32 amp 3 phase outlets (22 kW) are a common standard and often available in Australia (see numerous posts in this forum) and common in quite a few areas worldwide (PlugShare app).
The lower charging speed means that a 200 km lunchtime 3 phase top up would take 2 hours 40 mins instead of 2 hours. You would have to eat very slowly indeed, and be struggling to entertain your co-travellers.
In australia tesla supply 3 charging methods;I am finding all this terminology confusing, lets see how much I can get right.
On the car, you can have a charger, 11kW or 16.5kW. Or you can have two 11kW chargers to get 22kW.
Then you have different connections to the power source:
* mobile connection; any power point.
* standard wall connector, presumably this will get 11kW. I assume this is what comes free with the car.
* HPWC - is this just the same as above but up 18kW. Can't seem to find any reference to these on Tesla's website. Presumably this requires dual chargers.
* supercharger. Apparently won't charge any faster with dual chargers.
I see reports of superchargers up to 120kW - does this mean they somehow bypass the on board chargers?
Which charges at a faster rate? superchargers or HPWC? Or is the correct answer "it depends?"
From Google I found this which says the maximum a HPWC can produce in Australia is 18kW (on single phase; can't you do 3 phase in Australia?) in which case, if true, dual chargers may not offer a big advantage over the 16.5kW option.
I might be completely confused however.
I have dual chargers and 3 phase 32 amp HPWC at home and am getting 130km/h charge rate which is a lot faster than 75km/h.
Supercharger which supplies DC current to direct charge the batteries, bypassing th onboard charger(s)
Are there are other chargers apart from Tesla's superchargers that can supply DC current direct to the car? I imagine if this was possible it might be expensive.
Tritrum in Brisbane sell a CHAdeMO charger for approx $30,000.Are there are other chargers apart from Tesla's superchargers that can supply DC current direct to the car? I imagine if this was possible it might be expensive.
That's definitely lateral thinking!Are there are other chargers apart from Tesla's superchargers that can supply DC current direct to the car? I imagine if this was possible it might be expensive.
Funny but I guess it shows there are no easy work-arounds to the removal of dual chargers.Tritrum in Brisbane sell a CHAdeMO charger for approx $30,000.
How does two chargers under the rear seat impact on spatials at the nose?See the diagrams in the following documentation:
https://www.teslamotors.com/sites/d...al_Motor_Model_S_Emergency_Response_Guide.pdf
Got to it via this link:
First Responders | Tesla Motors Australia
It shows the second charger is positioned in the rear of the car - looks like directly above the battery adjacent to the primary charger - below the rear seat. I am sceptical that they removed the provision of a second charger just due to the new nose...
How does two chargers under the rear seat impact on spatials at the nose?
That Model X Guide shows the charger right behind the charging point on the left of the boot.Looks like the single charger in the Model X is in a different position. Wonder if they relocated it for the 2016 Model S too? If so, this might explain something.
https://www.teslamotors.com/sites/default/files/pdfs/2016_Model_X_Emergency_Response_Guide.pdf
Also the new 16.5kW option is a firmware upgrade only from the standard 11kW, and does not involve extra hardware like the old 22kW dual chargers.
I imagine however that Tesla may not have considered the requirements of the Australian market when making this change....
From the following article I'm guessing around 38 kms more with the new nose - maybe closer to 25 kms in real driving?
Tesla surpasses the 300-mile single-charge range barrier
Adam (Tesla Deliv Specialist) did say that the location of the charger inside the Model S has changed, so that does confirm your theory that the Model X treatment has probably been applied to the Model S.Adam (Tesla Deliv Specialist) did say that the location of the charger inside the Model S has changed, so that does confirm your theory that the Model X treatment has probably been applied to the Model S.
Also the new 16.5kW option is a firmware upgrade only from the standard 11kW, and does not involve extra hardware like the old 22kW dual chargers.
As to the reasons for this change I will guess ...
1) Reducing the risk of the mains voltage cable runing through the car, and
2) A probable associated cost saving from eliminating the mains voltage cable, as well as not having to provide connection points in every car for dual chargers that would only be installed in a minority of cars.
That Model X Guide shows the charger right behind the charging point on the left of the boot.
Adam (Tesla Deliv Specialist) did say that the location of the charger inside the Model S has changed, so that does confirm your theory that the Model X treatment has probably been applied to the Model S.
Also the new 16.5kW option is a firmware upgrade only from the standard 11kW, and does not involve extra hardware like the old 22kW dual chargers.
As to the reasons for this change I will guess ...
1) Reducing the risk of the mains voltage cable runing through the car, and
2) A probable associated cost saving from eliminating the mains voltage cable, as well as not having to provide connection points in every car for dual chargers that would only be installed in a minority of cars.