You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If I was doing some critical benchmark for range I sure as hell would NOT be using the HVAC heater which I know would pull lots of power from the pack.
I think Tesla was being refreshingly honest in describing the drive.
I think Tesla was being refreshingly honest in describing the drive.
...
It sounds like they are still working on optimizing the 3.0 changes. I'm happy to give them time to do that!
A side benefit of the lower Wh/km is the car will effectively charge faster.
I think Tesla was being refreshingly honest in describing the drive. They drove right around the speed limit, they used heat when they wanted to keep comfortable going over the Grapevine (and a few weeks ago it could have been in the high 30's to low 40's, cold for us wimpy Californian's ;-) and they still arrived with a nice safety cushion of range. You know, real world driving.
If they had not used any heat during a wintertime drive, driven a lot slower than the 70mph speed limit on I5, and driven the battery down to practically zero then they would be criticized for not driving "realistically". And quite likely they could have driven almost 400 miles.
It sounds like they are still working on optimizing the 3.0 changes. I'm happy to give them time to do that!
Possibly this may not be the only test, and if there are more tests they'd want to run, there's nothing wrong in stating that.
The 1.5 is missing a few things though. Like the tire learning mode, different PEM etc. I think the upgrade from the 1.5 may be pretty drastic.
At $0.33 per KWH electric cost, vs 30mi/gallon the Integra gets, at current gas prices the two are about equal in cost.