Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Russia/Ukraine conflict

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
1697385777032.png
 
And Ukraine is doing a better job putting the shot on target which really starts to push the advantage in their favor.

The West has a new doctrine when it comes to Russian artillery: "Mass can be overcome with precision." Ukraine is attacking three critical components of Russia's capabilities:
  1. Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence (C3I)
  2. Logistics (especially ammunition supply)
  3. Point Targets of Opportunity (in time+space)
 
Last edited:
North Korea and Russia have a land border. It's only about 9 miles long, but there is a bridge across the river called the Korea-Russia Friendship Bridge. From looking at the satellite photos it appears to be a rail bridge.

It is possible to glean records on Russian rail traffic. @petit_bateau has posted information about the China-Russia cross border rail traffic. If that can be determined via open source means, the US government has the resources to measure NK-Russia rail traffic.

North Korea–Russia border
Remnants of the Paris to Pusan RR?
 
I've been following this daily Swedish Blog about the Russian Dictator's Genocide in Ukraine since shortly after this total war began.

Today there's a reference to an article in one of Sweden's leading daily newspapers – Svenska Dagbladet. The article is paywalled. The article allegedly describes one combat op. where UKR troops attacked some of the Dictator's serfs. I do not however know when in time this op. took place. UKR troops allegedly got into some kind of minefield. Enemy artillery opened fire. And there was also enemy attack helicopters active. In spite of all of this the UKR troops took the enemy trenches. But again – allegedly – these enemy trenches, don't know how many and to what an extent, where mined. And the enemy blew the trenches remotely.

I'm guessing that the extent of this problem is unknown, but does anyone have an idea of how common it is?

IMO this genocide has gone on for way, way, way too long already. IMO it's time to step up the support to UKR. They need as much long range precision missiles as we in the West can spare – as well as everything else that can be useful.

And if there are further economic sanctions than can be taken, then those sanctions should be implemented as well
.

This Israeli-Palestininan 'distraction' – if it can be allowed to phrase it that way – could work both ways... It also seems like a time as good as any to 'turn up the heat' on the Russian Dictator 'to eleven'. Or beyond...


The blog (in Swedish):

The paywalled article (in Swedish):
 
Last edited:
First documented use of ATACMS.
No idea if this is accurate information, but very interesting if it is.
Context is that there was apparently a very successful attack on Berdyansk airfield last night with reportedly up to 9 helos destroyed/damaged.


ETA: Looking likely:
This was an excellent strategy. Ukraine needed ATACMS since the the beginning of the full scale invasion. Signaling suggested they were slowly getting closer to deliver. First they were told "no way" - don't want these to target things in Russia to later "we're thinking about it", but within last few months ostensibly the answer became "no". Yet as we can now say in retrospect, behind the scenes the answer was actually yes.

This does a couple important things. It allowed for the surprise attack on the occupying Russian army airfield where many helicopters were destroyed as well as other equipment and Russian troops. Had Putin known ATACMS would be delivered, he would have pulled much aviation equipment out of strike range.

But another major thing this does is keep Putin on edge. Will the West continue to secretly deliver more things in the future despite saying no? Just to be safe, Russia will have to weaken their own logistical chains, pulling back force projecting elements from the most vulnerable range of some weapon the Ukrainians may or may not have.
 
This was an excellent strategy. Ukraine needed ATACMS since the the beginning of the full scale invasion. Signaling suggested they were slowly getting closer to deliver. First they were told "no way" - don't want these to target things in Russia to later "we're thinking about it", but within last few months ostensibly the answer became "no". Yet as we can now say in retrospect, behind the scenes the answer was actually yes.

Likely they needed the time to rewrite the software to 'geofence' the target domain. Suchomimus on YouTube did a 10 min video on the strike today.
 
THIS is the kind of thing I've been hoping to hear. 9 fewer Russian helicopters, ammo, and other airstrip damage. Incremental, field-by field territory gains by Ukraine make little difference compared to going to the source and destroying Russia's capability to destroy.
 
Last edited:
Can't find any other sources for this, but (see Edit below) allegedly:

The Czech Republic will get rid of its dependence on oil from Russia.

"We are creating real energy sovereignty. In a matter of months, we will get rid of our dependence on Russian oil. Nuclear fuel is expected to follow," said the Czech Prime Minister.


EDIT: It seems the source is in the tweet, and in Czech.