You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oopsies, you are right, i was thinking of OIWell it can't go down...
Buy ITM LEAPs if you have to buy CallsI keep telling folks to stop buying these lottery tickets, which expire worthless, what 9/10 times? One time you get lucky with a decent win, mostly not
Options trading is heavily skewed favour of the sellers, even more so with seller that do their homework, and even more with sellers that know the stock they are trading inside-out and watch their positions closely...
No offence, @TheTalkingMule, but it's a recipe for bleeding capital
I, too, have been burned many a time buying options that you go in thinking you can’t lose. ‘Capital burn’ as a good descriptor of this. Selling only for me now, unless we are talking leaps…
my 10/1 BCS is atEyeing closing out my 670/700 BPS. Currently at 84%. Would like to see it move just a TAD further.
Also eyeing opening up a BCS for 10/01 expiration. Thoughts on strike prices? The 770/800 looks tempting, but it's also just 20 points away from the current share price, and might get blown through if there is momentum upward.
I believe it is the very high put side imbalance.Does anyone have any insight into the mechanics of the crazy difference between calls and puts right now? At SP ~750 a p725 is 2.75 while a c775 is 0.26. That a 10x difference for basically the same delta. Is it just pure supply/demand forces or can the MMs skew those prices deliberately?
The risk is fully defined in a BPS. Your max loss per contract is (720-690-1.10)*100 = 2890. At 100 contracts then your max win is 11000 and your max loss is 289000. If the stock ends the week > 720 you get max win. If the stock ends < 690 you get max loss. In the middle is a gradient. There is nothing more to it from a gain/loss perspective, but note that once the stock price passes the midpoint of the spread to the downside (705) you cannot roll for credit.For you BPS traders - if I look at opening a -720/+690 BPS, the net credit despite a green day looks like ~$1.10. If I sell 100 of these, and am very confident the stock won't end the week at or below 720, is there a risk I'm not seeing? I've only ever sold calls and puts... is there some other mechanic of a BPS that I'm missing that makes this riskier?
Before the inevitable comments to read back through the thread, I've done that to an extent, but not seen this question answered specifically.
Thanks for the succinct answer!The risk is fully defined in a BPS. Your max loss per contract is (720-690-1.10)*100 = 2890. At 100 contacts then your max win is 11000 and your max loss is 289000. If the stock ends the week > 720 you get max win. If the stock ends < 690 you get max loss. In the middle is a gradient. There is nothing more to it from a gain/loss perspective, but note that once the stock price passes the midpoint of the spread to the downside (705) you cannot roll for credit.
It's all about your personal risk tolerance. I would consider that a narrow spread and narrow spreads can go from max profit to max loss very quickly if things turn south. Wider spreads are more forgiving. That trade would have been hugely profitable on Monday, but today most of the value has eroded, to me it would not be worth it anymore. Best of luck if you try it.For you BPS traders - if I look at opening a -720/+690 BPS, the net credit despite a green day looks like ~$1.10. If I sell 100 of these, and am very confident the stock won't end the week at or below 720, is there a risk I'm not seeing? I've only ever sold calls and puts... is there some other mechanic of a BPS that I'm missing that makes this riskier?
Before the inevitable comments to read back through the thread, I've done that to an extent, but not seen this question answered specifically.
I hope you are right. I have a log full of averaging down for loosing long option positions that went bust. Those are often my largest losses. Well crap that was a deal at $16 per contract now it’s $8. Then later wow now it’s only $3, better get 5 more. Dang, $1.5, 15 more. Now my average cost is 7.50. Then they expire worthless.No sympathy for theta woes in the "main thread", so I'll do my whining here. 10/8 $800c down another 10% this morning with SP up 1%. I feel like we're gonna pop near to $800 just before P&D, so I'm gonna avg myself down a bit at a paltry $3.65/contract today.
If I understand the idea correctly, wouldn't you roll the long / insurance put UP or closer to the short / money making put?Just a small suggestion: when my short put gets so DITM and I feel the need to leverage up into next week's puts, I roll this week's DITM puts down $20-40, paying literally $50 for $4k of cushion a piece. Maybe you don't need it but I found this risk management technique works well my for my mental.
The PR is at 2pm eastern right?Gap perfectly closed. Now it goes down and buy call back at the low before Fed meeting? lol
View attachment 712726
I often roll the short puts down. In my opinion, the risk lies in how close the short puts are to the stock price, not how wide the spread is. While you'd spend less money to release the same amount of margin if you rolled the long puts up, the risk wouldn't get reduced by that much.If I understand the idea correctly, wouldn't you roll the long / insurance put UP or closer to the short / money making put?
An example of how I am thinking about the idea (not something I've done before, but I like the sound of) - I have 630/730 puts open right now for this Friday. They are priced at .38 and 3.25. I want to let them continue with the time decay but I also want to recover margin to open a position for next week. I could cut the margin for the position in half by rolling the insurance put from 630 to 680 where the option is priced at .70. I pay .22 now (.70 - .38) and cut the margin reservation in half.
That'd only be valuable if I want to open a new position.
Whether I understand your notion correctly or not, this opens up another possibility. I opened these 630/730s because it was over a week to expiration and I didn't have a good sense of the closing price this week. I was being aggressive but I thought safe and the wide spread helped me with that combination (relatively aggressive, while also more management choices in case I'm badly wrong). Now here on Wednesday I think that 730 is completely safe. I can just allow this position to continue aging, OR a new idea that just occurred to me.
Roll from my 1x 630/730 position to 2x680/730 positions. I'll collect the current premium - 3.25 on the additional 1x positions, while paying the difference in premium for the current insurance, and adding the full cost of the new position.
So the current position at 3.25 - .22 becomes two positions at 3.25 - .70. I gain 2.55 on the new position and pay back .22 rolling the existing up for a net 2.30 per current position I am doubling up on. H'mm... And I'm not ready to open a put spread for next week, so increasing the available premium to earn this week sure sounds like a winner to me.
I could get really crazy and roll this whole mess up to 735 or 740 at the same time for even further premium, given that I expect this 740-750 range to hold. I think I have a management trade for myself for later this morning after the Fed report is out and we see what happens
Thanks @dl003!!
I often roll the short puts down. In my opinion, the risk lies in how close the short puts are to the stock price, not how wide the spread is. While you'd spend less money to release the same amount of margin if you rolled the long puts up, the risk wouldn't get reduced by that much.