... puts some label on their username signaling their bad feedback?
That's a brilliant idea, TSLAopt.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
... puts some label on their username signaling their bad feedback?
Spot on.You can't compare a Tesla to an Ipad. Cars are made to get you from point A to point B, and 5 years from now you will still be able to drive the Model S all over the world exactly the same as you can today. A 5 year old Ipad is no good on the other hand, because it doesn't have enough storage, new apps may not be compatible with it anymore, or new software has higher hardware requirements than a 5 year old Ipad might have.
I could not disagree any more with some of the opinions on this topic. Yes, the Model E or the new Model S 3-5 years from now will have some newer technology (like autopilot or AWD) but that is not enough to make an older model obsolete.
It is like saying that a 2012 Subaru Outback is obsolete, because the 2013 has push button start, memory seats, rearview camera, and several safety features called eyesight (lane departure, blind spot monitor, etc.). In reality these cars will be worth almost the same amount of money on the used car market. The 2012 might go for $18k and the 2013 for $21k or so.
All of the important stuff surrounding Model S will never get substantially better enough to make the old model useless: speed, acceleration, handling, etc. That is what makes a car. All of the other stuff, such as parking sensors, vented seats, etc. are just luxury items that really don't add much value to a used car.
If a Model S is built to last 200K+ miles, then it will for sure be worth more than 50% after 3 years and 30k miles on it. Guaranteed!
Not in the case of vehicles. I've only bought used vehicles, and never once did I value those vehicles on what the newer version may or may not have, it's irrelevant. For your supposition to be true people would have to cross shop used and new vehicles of the same model, that doesn't happen. A 3 year old Model S will still outperform the majority of all vehicles, and it's 200+ miles of range will still be compelling for most people. Those people shopping a used S are not in the market to spend twice as much on a new one, no matter what range it may have or if it might get to 60 0.5 seconds sooner.Resale value (of nearly any product) is predicated, essentially, on a lack of progress. When tomorrow's product is identical to today's, then the product holds its value.
The only way your resale value will drop is if Tesla or someone else offers a similar vehicle with similar specs near the price of a used Model S. I think the likely hood of that happening in three years is minimal.ICE drive train technology is rather stagnant, with only minor improvements each decade. The improvements expected in the electric drive train, particularly with range, are going to be significant. That's a good thing for the EV movement, but it'll have a significant negative impact on the resale value of early EVs.
The resale of my Model S is going to drop when Tesla plugs new tech into the 2016 Model S that gives it a 350 mile range and improves it's 0-60.
If you don't cross shop any used item against new to decide the best bang for your dollar, then you're purposely putting on blinders.Not in the case of vehicles. I've only bought used vehicles, and never once did I value those vehicles on what the newer version may or may not have, it's irrelevant. For your supposition to be true people would have to cross shop used and new vehicles of the same model, that doesn't happen.
FYI there is a "bonaire" on Seeking Alpha with a high FUD factor as well. I reserved judgement and thought I'd give him a chance to prove himself here before I mentioned it, and he has.bonaire is a troll, don't waste your time responding to him (or her).
FYI there is a "bonaire" on Seeking Alpha with a high FUD factor as well. I reserved judgement and thought I'd give him a chance to prove himself here before I mentioned it, and he has.
Yea, sorry, I'm a major culprit on that. Guess it goes into the Long Term Fundamentals?We are way OT here.
Yea, sorry, I'm a major culprit on that. Guess it goes into the Long Term Fundamentals?
Back on topic, the price of options. Well, LEAPS, so maybe that's long term too. We were discussing a couple days ago that volatility increases the premium on options. Any rules of thumb for knowing when the implied volatility is reaching it's nadir and thus is a good time to buy options? TSLA can be crazy volatile, so does it's implied volatility ever die down much?
Where do I find when Jan2016 becomes available? The only link I can find seems to indicate it should be available now.On another side note with LEAPs, in November I believe the Jan 2016 LEAPs for TSLA should become available. Those will be very interesting to see how they are priced...probably will be very expensive.
Where do I find when Jan2016 becomes available? The only link I can find seems to indicate it should be available now.
Monday, September 16, 2013: 2016 LEAPS begin trading for January cycle option classes. A notice listing the new LEAPS series will be distributed during the week of September 9th.
Would it make sense to load up on the Jan2015's before then and roll into the 2016's when they become available?It's Nov 11. Which is like the worst possible time because that will most likely be three days after Q3 ER. If Q3 is a blowout then Nov 11 will be the worst time to buy options; I expect ER to be on Nov 06.
Yea, sorry, I'm a major culprit on that. Guess it goes into the Long Term Fundamentals?
Back on topic, the price of options. Well, LEAPS, so maybe that's long term too. We were discussing a couple days ago that volatility increases the premium on options. Any rules of thumb for knowing when the implied volatility is reaching it's nadir and thus is a good time to buy options? TSLA can be crazy volatile, so does it's implied volatility ever die down much?[/QUOT]
I'll give you a few scenario as a basis of IV. But true understanding can only be gained after you've watched it for long enough.
The formula I use for calculating IV is different from what others uses. Other people's 100 is equals to my 1.
For most normal stocks IV of 0.4 is considered high volatility. For TSLA, 0.4 IV is on the low end. When IV is at around 0.4, you can sell a monthly option 3 strike out and still make decent money.
Take V for example. It is on a straight channel up, but its IV is super low in the 0.20 range. This is because its rise is so predictable that even if it reaches the top of the channel, the market maker that wrote the option can still fleece you. This is a case where buying the stock actually earns more than an option even if the stock went the direction that you wanted.
For TSLA, it has seen IV above 1 twice. Now when IV goes above 1, several funny things happen. The black scholes model changes into a multiplication effect instead of a decaying effect. Which means that all the theoretical option pricing goes out of whack on the ITM and near ITM options. I think when this happens, the market maker just go by their gut feeling. Maybe I made a mistake in my derivation of the Black Scholes formula, but that is the impression I got when I worked on it and also from my option trading experience. On any gap up, it is easy for TSLA to reach an IV of 0.8.
The other time when I see any stock's IV goes above 1 is when I was observing the bank stocks during the financial collapse.
My suggestion for any stock with IV above 1, is to short any type of option it has. I sold both call and puts when it happened just because I am 99% sure that IV will eventually fall below 0.8. Kind of like VIX will have 100% of going above 10 within any given year. Of course, the one time that this strategy might blow up in your face, is during the financial collapse on bank stocks. So exercise caution.
Also on TM forums with largely neutral posts bordering on problematic. Just FYI, but I only know of 3 troll-like contributors so I don't mind the 'opinions' unless it is causing unrest. The mod's do a great job, IMHO, when it 'crosses the line'
I still find it amuzing that many people here have held on to TSLA through the three week consolidation period and as soon as the stock broke up 5% to ~$174 everyone is selling. This is the exact opposite of what you should be doing. This is a bullish breakout trade above $173.80 on high volume and this is a great entry point to buy.
I would like to warn you gus on buying options on the next "dip". Implied volitility will be very high, so the best time to buy is during a consolidation. Unless of course you get a 20% - 25% Goldman like dip, then you buy as much as you can.
Frankfurt's up. 136.5 euro, or about $184.63. Generally a good bellwether for TSLA on the Nasdaq.